Pillar To Post

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

DESIGN / NEW NFL STADIUM FOR DC BY 2030


The Washington Commanders want their proposed stadium to feel unmistakably like Washington. Designed by HKS, the arena would rise on the former RFK Stadium site beside the Anacostia River, returning the team to the ground associated with its championship years. 

The exterior renderings show a continuous white colonnade and a sculpted, transparent roof. Its lower profile along the east–west axis is meant to respect views toward the Capitol and the city’s monuments. Commanders stadium design announcement The most interesting choice is inside. 

Instead of dividing spectators with stacked premium decks, HKS proposes a single seating bowl sweeping upward from the field, with minimal overhangs. More lower-level seats, steep sightlines and a roof designed to send crowd noise back toward the field aim to recover RFK’s famously close, raucous atmosphere. 

A dedicated “Wall of Fans” would give passionate supporters an imposing presence, with some seats planned at more affordable prices. Commanders seating-bowl announcement It is an appealing marriage of civic ceremony and football noise. The drawings promise a landmark; the real test will be whether the finished stadium feels as welcoming and loud as it looks. Opening is projected for 2030. 



Tuesday, September 22, 2026

A FLEXIBLE VISIT TO BEND, OREGON WITHOUT A BOAT

 

Falling in love with Bend, Oregon while attending the Oregon Writers Conference at the Riverhouse Lodge

By Jennifer Silva Redmond, Author of Honeymoon at Sea.  Next in a continuing series of liveaboard (and off) adventures. 

My recent trip to beautiful Bend, Oregon, wasn’t really meant to be a vacation. I was scheduled to teach at the inaugural Central Oregon Writers Conference and the venue for the event was Bend’s Riverhouse Lodge. Having visited Bend before, I knew we were in for a treat, but I hadn’t counted on the drive there being one of them. 

 Leaving from Poulsbo, Washington, we loaded up our rental car early and were on the rainy road by 8:30am. We drove down a scenic but slow and winding stretch of highway 101 to Olympia and then headed for Interstate 5. It was nice to get onto the freeway and be able to drive the speed limit after the constant stop-and-go of the previous 90 minutes.  

Jennifer & Russel burg
The trip to Portland and east toward Mt Hood went smoothly, but was rather dull, with virtually every bit of scenery veiled by gray clouds and intermittent rain showers. But once we passed Government Camp, and the completely shrouded mountain and began to head east and downhill toward Warm Springs Reservation, the sun finally came out. By the time we were passing through the reservation, the sky was blue with white puffy clouds and we were able to admire the stark and stunning topography of Oregon’s high desert. 

At the next highway junction we headed south and soon were driving through Redmond, which is always fun for anyone named Redmond, for the obvious reason. The flag-festooned streets of the charming little city—they love flags, there, and were most likely still decorated from Columbus Day—sparkled after the recent rains. And the next stop south was our destination, situated on the Deschutes River, at a—you guessed it—big bend on the riverbank. 

The Deschutes River flows through the conference hotel grounds.

There are so many parks in Bend, I won’t even try to list them all, but if you like hiking or mountain-biking, it is the place. We pulled into the Riverhouse Lodge and soon were in our room, putting things away and preparing for the first event of the three-day conference. 

Our room had a tiny balcony that looked over the racing river. The ground floor rooms all had fire pits on their patios, and one of those rooms was the gathering place for the first night introductions. The two hotel buildings straddle the Deschutes River, with the main building housing the Currents Restaurant and bar, and our building a short walk over a covered bridge across the narrow, rocky river. 


The patio and fire pit (above) was a central attraction of the room where we instructors, the conference organizers, and attendees spent the next couple of hours, noshing, drinking, and getting to know each other. 

 The next day I was up early to attend the morning speaker’s talk, and took a stroll around the gorgeous grounds. Every view of the rushing river seemed an even better shot; I took dozens of photos on that first walk before heading to the conference center, which was also in a lovely woodsy riverside setting. There were gorgeous views out the many windows, as one would expect, but also plenty of cool interior touches like this cozy fireside sitting area. 

That day I taught a class about how to pitch your book and write a query letter, held a read & critique session where a handful of people read the first few pages of their work aloud to get instantaneous feedback, then I spoke privately with a few authors who had sent in material beforehand. 

 During the one-hour lunch break, Russel and I headed out to find a healthy meal that wasn’t too far away, the hotel restaurant being already full by that time. The Natural Grocers store across the street hit the spot on both counts, and we were able to get fruit and yogurt for the next day’s breakfast as well as a couple of salads and some rye crackers. 

And, since we were already stocked up with healthful food, we stopped next door at Delish Donuts and picked up a couple of sweet treats—dessert before lunch, why not? Clearly, I needed energy for teaching my afternoon classes—one about point of view and one on how to put expository information into writing without readers noticing. 

 On Sunday, after the final speaker and the awards presentations, we headed to the hotel’s Currents restaurant with two presenter friends and their partners. The restaurant’s views are stunning, but we’d seen enough of the outdoors by then, so, after ordering an IPA from Deschutes Brewery at the bar (below), we found a fireside lounging area to chat and sip. 


Not much later, the hostess found a nearby dining table for the six of us. Earlier in the day, I had noted the presence of a big barrel-style meat smoker in front with a sign for the day’s special—smoked brisket. The meat was savory and tender; it turns out they have a special smoked meat almost every day. 

The fresh salmon dinner Russel had was gorgeous and just as yummy as it looked. 


Our friends had dined there earlier, and said that brunch was delicious, too. Apparently, they also have live music available, some Sundays. The next morning, we hit the road early again, as we had plans to visit old friends in Vancouver, Washington, just over the border from Portland, the city that we have been hearing lately is “war-torn hellhole.” 

Needless to say, Portland was calm and beautiful, its millions of trees and parks all sparkling after a brief rain shower, the only thing even slightly hellish being the lunch-hour traffic. 

 Lunch in Vancouver was delightful, not only the great conversation but the fresh and perfectly prepared meal of nearly overflowing bento boxes at a local neighborhood Japanese restaurant called Mio Sushi. Full and happy, we headed north toward Poulsbo and our “home sweet boat.”  ###



Monday, September 21, 2026

,MEDIA MONDAY / GOLDEN GATE GOUGING: A $10 TOLL TOO FAR


California already charges motorists the nation’s highest gasoline levies. Must crossing a public bridge cost double digits, too? 

OPINION. By the Editors of PillartoPost.org daily online magazine--California motorists are accustomed to being treated as rolling revenue sources. Every visit to a gasoline pump comes with a reminder that this state imposes the highest gasoline taxes and fees in the nation. 

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, California’s state gasoline taxes and fees stood at 70.9 cents per gallon at the beginning of 2026—more than twice the national state average of 33.5 cents. 

As of July 1, the state excise tax alone rose to 63.4 cents per gallon. 

Then there is the Golden Gate Bridge, where the privilege of driving across the span that connects San Francisco County to Marin County, now costs an ordinary motorist $10.25 with FasTrak, $10.50 with a license-plate account and $11.25 if the bill arrives by mail. 

The bridge has always been magnificent. The toll is highway robbery with a postcard view. 

 For a commuter making the southbound crossing five days a week for 50 working weeks, the FasTrak toll comes to $2,562.50 a year. Use the customary 260-workday calculation and the annual bite is $2,665. That is not loose change. It is a household bill—money unavailable for groceries, rent, medicine, school expenses or, fittingly enough, gasoline. 

 The Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District collected $161.0 million in toll revenue during fiscal 2025 from nearly 16.9 million southbound crossings. Its defense for this seemingly highway robbery is that the money does more than paint and maintain the bridge: the district says roughly two-thirds of annual toll revenue operates and maintains the span, while about one-third supports Golden Gate bus and ferry service. 

Public transit deserves support. 

The question is why one captive class of motorists must carry so much of that burden every time it crosses a bridge that opened in 1937? The obvious reply is that an 89-year-old suspension bridge hanging over salt water costs a fortune to maintain. 

Fair enough. 

How much of a fortune? 

The district’s fiscal 2025 financial report lists $28.7 million specifically for Bridge Division maintenance. It separately reports $20.7 million for operations, $31.0 million for general and administrative expense and $15.9 million for depreciation. 

Total Bridge Division operating expense: $96.3 million. That is real money and real work—but it is still about $64.7 million less than the toll revenue collected that year. 

 And hold on to that $15.9 million depreciation figure. Depreciation is not a cash maintenance payment. It is an accounting entry that allocates the recorded cost of the bridge’s capital assets and subsequent improvements across their estimated useful lives. 

No one writes a $15.9 million depreciation check, and it does not mean the Golden Gate loses $15.9 million in market value every year. 

The charge has been explained over and over again as a legitimate financial accounting, but it should not be presented to motorists as $15.9 million spent that year painting steel, replacing equipment or tightening bolts. 

 For perspective, the entire original bridge came in at $35 million when it opened in 1937. Using the federal Consumer Price Index, that is roughly $790 million to $800 million in today’s purchasing power. 

The district’s own historical accounting says the last construction bonds were retired in 1971 after tollpayers covered $35 million in principal and nearly $39 million in interest. 

In other words, motorists paid off the bridge that built the bridge more than half a century ago. Today’s toll is financing present operations, capital work, reserves and transit—not retiring original builder Joseph Strauss’s construction debt. 

 The district’s books also show why the motorist’s bill keeps climbing: the bridge operation produced $65.3 million in operating income before non-operating items, while the bus and ferry divisions lost money. 

Calling the entire toll a bridge-maintenance charge therefore blurs the truth. 

A substantial share is a transit assessment collected at a bridge gantry. Why not put bridge care out to competitive bid? Parts of it already are. The district advertises invitations for bids and requests for proposals for construction, engineering, underwater inspection, equipment, paint and other work; even its International Orange paint is competitively purchased. Some permanent in-house capability is sensible for emergencies, continuous inspection, security and specialized work on a one-of-a-kind structure. The public should not want the cheapest unqualified contractor dangling over the Pacific with a paintbrush. 

 But that does not end the argument—it begins it. 

Every separable maintenance package should be competitively bid or benchmarked against a qualified outside price. The district should publish the fully loaded in-house cost, the outside bids, the safety qualifications and the reason for its selection. If district employees can do the job better and cheaper, prove it. If a qualified contractor can save millions without compromising safety, hire it. 

What motorists should no longer accept is a double-digit toll backed by a general assurance that maintaining the bridge is expensive. 

 Now look south, Sacramento—about 500 miles south—to the San Diego–Coronado Bridge. It opened in 1969, stretches roughly 2.1 miles across San Diego Bay and carries State Route 75. Its construction bonds were paid off in 1986. Tolls continued for another 16 years, but on June 27, 2002, the collection booths finally closed. 

Today the price in either direction is nada as in Zip. Free. 

The Coronado Bridge did not collapse when the toll disappeared. It did not become an orphan. Caltrans still maintains it, traffic still crosses it and San Diego Bay remains beneath it. The bridge is supported through the same broad public-financing machinery used for other state highways and public infrastructure. 

Free at the point of crossing does not mean free to maintain; it means the cost is not imposed as a daily penalty on the people who must use that particular link. 

 The comparison is not perfectly symmetrical. The Golden Gate district is a special district, not Caltrans, and it operates a regional bridge-and-transit network. That distinction explains the accounting. It does not excuse an ever-rising toll or relieve Sacramento of responsibility. 

State lawmakers as the voice of the citizens they represent in the Legislature can demand transparency, impose conditions on state assistance, revise governing authority and give motorists a meaningful voice in how an indispensable public crossing is financed. 

 At minimum, the Legislature and the district should freeze further toll increases, commission a truly independent audit, publish a plain-language accounting of every toll dollar and establish a heavily discounted commuter rate with an annual cap. 

Transit subsidies should be debated and funded openly across the region—not quietly loaded onto one bridge crossing because the motorists using it have no practical alternative. 

 Better yet, California should begin reducing the toll toward the San Diego model. 

If complete removal cannot happen immediately, set a public schedule for bringing the charge back to single digits, then lower it further as operating efficiencies and broader transportation funding permit. 

A toll should cover a demonstrated need, not become a permanent cash cow simply because generations of drivers have learned to surrender. 

 The Golden Gate Bridge was built to connect Californians. At $10.25 and rising, it increasingly feels as though government is charging admission to their own state. 

 San Diego proved that a great California bridge can serve the public without shaking down every passing motorist. Get it, Sacramento? 

###

 SOURCE NOTES:  

--Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, “Tolls & Payment,” rates effective July 1, 2026. 

 Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, “Annual Vehicle Crossings and Toll Revenues,” FY 2025. 

-- Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, Five-Year Toll Program materials. 

-- Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, FY 2024/2025 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, Supplemental Schedule of Revenues and Expenses by Division.

--Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, “Bridge Construction” and “Bonds Paid Off” historical records. 

--Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, “How To Do Business” and Contract & Vendor Opportunities materials. U.S. Energy Information Administration, state gasoline taxes and fees as of January 1, 2026. 

--U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Historical Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), 1937 and 2025 annual averages. 

--California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, fuel tax rates for July 2026–June 2027. 

--California CEQAnet, San Diego–Coronado Bridge Toll Removal Project; ABC 10News historical report, June 27, 2025. 

Sunday, September 20, 2026

AMERICANA / THE MARK HOPKINS TURNS 100

The magnificent Mark Hopkins mansion commands the summit of Nob Hill in this late-19th-century view of San Francisco. Designed by architects Wright & Sanders and completed in 1878, the turreted Victorian showplace was built for Central Pacific Railroad magnate Mark Hopkins and his wife, Mary. Hopkins died before its completion and never lived beneath its elaborate roof. The mansion survived the great earthquake of April 18, 1906, but was consumed by the fires that followed. Two decades later, the Mark Hopkins Hotel rose on the same commanding site at California and Mason streets. Opened December 4, 1926, the landmark hotel celebrates its centennial in 2026—one hundred years above San Francisco and nearly 150 years after the Hopkins name first crowned Nob Hill.

If you are among the ranks of hotel aficionados, who hobby by staying at remarkable inns of note, mark your calendar for December 4 when San Francisco's Mark Hopkins hotel turns 100.

On December 4, 1926, the Hotel Mark Hopkins opened atop Nob Hill and immediately joined the ranks of San Francisco’s grand hotels. One century later, it remains in business at the same prestigious address, overlooking a city that has repeatedly rebuilt, expanded and reinvented itself. 

The 19-story hotel was designed by Weeks & Day, the prominent San Francisco architectural firm responsible for the Huntington Hotel and several major theaters. Its design combined the stately silhouette of a French château with Spanish ornamentation. 

Contemporary admirers proclaimed the finished hotel “architecturally perfect.” The location already possessed a colorful history. Mark Hopkins, one of the Central Pacific Railroad’s “Big Four,” selected the site for an elaborate mansion but died in 1878 before moving into it. 

The property later became the Mark Hopkins Institute of Art. The mansion survived the 1906 earthquake but was destroyed during the fires that followed. Mining engineer and hotel investor George D. Smith acquired the site in 1925, cleared the remaining art-school building and constructed the hotel that still bears Hopkins’ name. 

Nine large murals painted by California artists Maynard Dixon and Frank Van Sloun for the Room of the Dons were completed in time for the opening. The panels, including an image of the mythical Queen Calafia, remain among the hotel’s significant artistic features. 

The hotel’s most famous attraction arrived in 1939, when Smith converted its 19th-floor penthouse into the glass-walled Top of the Mark. Customers reportedly lined up down Nob Hill to enter the new cocktail lounge and admire its panoramic views. 

After the United States entered World War II, the lounge became an unofficial farewell station for servicemen departing for the Pacific. Soldiers, sailors and Marines shared final drinks there with wives and sweethearts. The “squadron bottle” tradition began when a serviceman left a bottle behind for members of his unit to enjoy when they returned. Veterans are still remembered through that tradition. 

 In 1945, the hotel entertained international delegates attending the San Francisco Conference that produced the United Nations Charter. Presidents, royalty, entertainers and business leaders also became part of its guest history. InterContinental assumed management in 1973. Extensive renovations during the following decades modernized the property while retaining its historic character. 

A $50 million project completed around 2000 reduced the room count by combining smaller accommodations into larger rooms and suites. Today, the InterContinental Mark Hopkins has approximately 380 guest rooms, including 39 suites, and continues operating as a luxury hotel. 

A 1929 advertisement offered rooms from $4 per night—the closest readily verifiable rate from the hotel’s opening era. Four dollars then represented approximately $75 in 2026 purchasing power. By 1940, advertisements listed rooms from $5 per day. 

Modern rates vary according to season, conventions and room category. Current booking information places the average at about $210 per night before taxes and fees, with some dates below $175 and high-demand nights exceeding $400. The prices and corporate names have changed, but the essential attraction has not. 

The Mark Hopkins still occupies one of San Francisco’s most valuable pieces of real estate: the crest of Nob Hill, where a cable car stops outside and a century of commerce, hospitality and history comes with the view. 


Saturday, September 19, 2026

COFFEE BEANS & BEINGS / COFFEE AT CASA ROMANTICA

 


Casa Romantica sits on a bluff above the San Clemente Pier, where its white stucco walls, red-tile roofs and gardens command one of Orange County’s grandest ocean views. 

What began as one man’s expression of the California dream now serves the public as a museum, gallery, botanical garden and performing-arts center. 

Ole Hanson, the former mayor of Seattle and principal founder of San Clemente, built the house in 1927. Hanson envisioned his new community as a “Spanish Village by the Sea,” and his family residence became the architectural model for the town growing around it. 

Architect Carl Lindbom designed a seven-bedroom, seven-bathroom Spanish Colonial Revival house arranged around a central courtyard. Among its memorable features are a circular moon-gate entrance, an octagonal study, Italian floor tiles, pegged hardwood floors and handmade Mexican roof tiles. Sliding glass doors and a private bathroom for every bedroom were considerable luxuries in the 1920s. 

Hanson’s real-estate fortunes collapsed during the Great Depression, and Bank of America foreclosed on the property in 1934. The house passed through several owners before the City of San Clemente acquired it. 

After a major restoration, Casa Romantica opened to the public as a nonprofit cultural center in 2003. It is now listed on the National Register of Historic Places and welcomes approximately 40,000 visitors annually. Visitors may explore the preserved rooms, changing art exhibitions, historical collections and 2½ acres of coastal gardens. 

The institution also presents concerts, lectures, workshops, children’s activities and community celebrations throughout the year. 


For coffee lovers
, the special attraction is the Coffee Concert series presented with San Clemente’s High Tide Coffee. The arrangement is simple: Casa Romantica provides the historic Main Salon and the musicians; High Tide provides complimentary gourmet coffee. 

At 10 a.m. on the third Friday of the month, visitors settle in for an hour-long acoustic performance by a local or regional musician. 

This is a morning concert with coffee, not a visit to a working coffeehouse. 

Casa Romantica does not operate a permanent café with espresso service, meals and tables available throughout the day. 

Its gift shop sells snacks and refreshments, but visitors should not arrive expecting to order a cappuccino and hold court until closing time. 

Those who want the complete coffeehouse experience can visit High Tide Coffee’s San Clemente shop at 1624 North El Camino Real, a short drive north of the Casa. 

One agreeable plan would be breakfast or a second cup at High Tide, followed by the concert, a walk through the historic house and a few unhurried minutes looking across the Pacific. 


A 2023 landslide damaged portions of the bluff, terrace and gardens and forced the property to close temporarily. All indoor rooms have since reopened, and the Ocean Terrace and several surrounding gardens partially reopened in September 2026. 

The Amphitheater, Woodland Garden and Native Bowl remain closed while recovery work continues. 

Casa Romantica is worth visiting without music or coffee. Add a fresh cup and an acoustic concert to its tiled rooms, shaded courtyard and ocean panorama, however, and a pleasant house tour becomes one of San Clemente’s better Friday mornings. 

 


MORE INFO 

Casa Romantica Cultural Center and Gardens 415 Avenida Granada San Clemente, CA 92672 (949) 498-2139 www.casaromantica.org 

Public hours: Tuesday through Thursday, 10 a.m.–4 p.m.; Friday through Sunday, 10 a.m.–2 p.m.; closed Mondays and federal holidays. 

Admission: $8 adults; free for children 12 and younger, active-duty military personnel with identification and Casa Romantica members. Admission is free for everyone on the first Sunday of each month. 

Coffee Concerts: Generally presented at 10 a.m. on the third Friday of each month. Complimentary High Tide coffee and the performance are included with regular admission. Check the online calendar before traveling because dates and programs can change. 

Parking: Free on-site parking is available but limited during construction. Additional parking can be found in the Pier Bowl and near the San Clemente Community Center and Library. 

By train: Amtrak’s Pacific Surfliner stops at San Clemente Pier daily. Metrolink serves the pier on weekends. Casa Romantica is uphill from the station. 

High Tide Coffee: 1624 North El Camino Real, San Clemente. Open daily, 7 a.m.–3 p.m.  




Friday, September 18, 2026

FRIDAY FISTFIGHTS / FIVE OF THE MOST COMBATIVE PRESIDENTS IN AMERICAN HISTORY


By the Editors & Illustrators of PillartoPost.org--“Combative” is a matter of historical interpretation, not an officially measured presidential quality. Still, five presidents repeatedly stand out for treating politics as open warfare—with Congress, the press, powerful institutions or personal enemies. Presented chronologically, they are Andrew Jackson, Andrew Johnson, Harry Truman, Richard Nixon and Donald Trump. 

ANDREW JACKSON, 1829–1837 Jackson entered the White House portraying himself as the defender of ordinary white Americans against bankers, political insiders and established privilege. His assault on the Second Bank of the United States became known as the “Bank War.” In 1834, the Senate censured him for assuming powers it considered unconstitutional. Jackson’s opponents formed the Whig Party partly in resistance to his expansion of presidential authority. A famous political cartoon depicted him trampling the Constitution beneath his feet under the title “King Andrew the First.” Jackson’s temper was not merely political theater. Before becoming president, he fought duels, carried bullets in his body and participated in numerous personal confrontations. 

ANDREW JOHNSON, 1865–1869--No president before the modern era conducted his feuds so publicly or self-destructively. Johnson considered congressional opposition a personal betrayal and attacked prominent lawmakers by name. During his disastrous 1866 speaking tour, known as the “Swing Around the Circle,” Johnson argued with hecklers and delivered angry speeches denouncing his opponents. His continual warfare with the Republican-controlled Congress over Reconstruction and protections for formerly enslaved Americans culminated in his impeachment. The House of Representatives impeached Johnson in 1868. The Senate acquitted him by one vote, allowing him to complete his term. He was the first American president to be impeached. 

HARRY S. TRUMAN, 1945–1953--Truman was combative without being consumed by conspiracy. His plainspoken 1948 campaign against what he called the Republican “do-nothing Congress” inspired supporters to shout, “Give ’em hell, Harry.” Truman fought publicly with Congress, labor leaders and the press. He fired General Douglas MacArthur during the Korean War after the general publicly challenged the administration’s policy. Truman could also make disagreements intensely personal. After Washington Post critic Paul Hume criticized his daughter Margaret’s singing, Truman sent him a furious letter and warned that an encounter with the president could result in a black eye and a broken nose. 

RICHARD NIXON, 1969–1974--Nixon’s combativeness was generally less visible in public than Johnson’s or Truman’s. Behind closed doors, however, Nixon divided the political world into loyalists and enemies. His administration maintained an “enemies list,” considered using federal agencies against opponents and created the White House “plumbers” to stop damaging information from reaching the press. Secret White House recordings revealed a president deeply suspicious of journalists, demonstrators and political adversaries. The Watergate scandal ultimately forced Nixon to resign rather than face almost certain impeachment and removal. He remains the only American president to have resigned from office. 

DONALD TRUMP, 2017–2021 AND 2025–PRESENT--Trump made confrontation a central feature of presidential communication. He repeatedly attacked political opponents, judges, government officials and news organizations while using rallies and social media to maintain direct contact with supporters. Donald Trump was impeached twice by the House of Representatives but acquitted both times by the Senate. The first impeachment, in 2019, involved charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The second, in 2021, charged him with incitement of insurrection following the January 6 attack on the Capitol. In 2024, a New York jury convicted Trump on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. He became the first former American president to be convicted of a felony and subsequently the first person with a felony conviction to serve as president. He received an unconditional discharge, meaning no imprisonment, fine or probation, and has appealed the conviction. 

THE CLOSEST COMPARISON--Donald Trump has no exact presidential twin. Andrew Jackson supplies the populist rebellion against established institutions. Richard Nixon supplies the preoccupation with enemies and hostile news organizations. Harry Truman supplies the pugnacious language and willingness to strike back personally. But in relentless public combativeness, Trump’s closest predecessor may be Andrew Johnson. Both presidents treated opposition as something beyond ordinary political disagreement and carried their fights directly to the public. Johnson’s presidency demonstrated that continual combat can energize loyal supporters while hardening opposition and weakening a president’s ability to govern. 


Thursday, September 17, 2026

THE FOODIST / MESA AGRICOLA’S TINY KITCHEN MAKES THE BIG TIME

 At Mesa Agricola, handmade tortillas carry a changing selection of slow-cooked guisados built from Baja memory and produce grown nearby. Photograph by Lauren di Matteo.

The New York Times
has placed an unadorned six-table Escondido counter among the nation’s 50 best restaurants. The distinction belongs as much to a nearby farm as it does to the stove.  Welcome to Escondido and Mesa Agricola (agriculture able}.

 But first, what is a guisados?

Guisados (Spanish): dishes of meat, vegetables, beans, or other ingredients slowly cooked in a seasoned sauce—essentially stews or braises.

Pronounced: gee-SAH-dohs. Singular: guisado.

***

 The distance between a Valley Center field and a warm tortilla in Escondido is about 12 miles. At Mesa Agricola, that short journey carries enough flavor, memory and ambition to earn the little restaurant a place on The New York Times Restaurant List for 2026, published this yesterday. 

Mesa Agricola is one of six California restaurants chosen for the Times list of 50 and the only selection from San Diego County. That is heady company for a counter-service shop with six tables, inside and out, and a dining room whose decorative bravura begins and ends with a dangling cactus. 

There is no velvet rope, no battalion of servers and no tasting-menu theater. There are guisados, tortillas and the daily proposition that careful farming can be tasted. Behind the restaurant are chef Juan González and farmer Megan Strom, husband and wife, whose partnership begins in the soil. 

Strom grows much of what reaches the kitchen at the couple’s farm in Valley Center; other ingredients come from nearby Southern California growers. Even the corn milled for the tortillas is local. 

González turns the harvest into the slow-cooked stews of Mexico: food that appears humble until the first bite reveals how much time and judgment have gone into it. The menu’s foundation is the guisado, the simmered preparation that belongs to home kitchens, neighborhood fondas and the Mexican midday table. 

González may offer seven to 11 on a given day, folded into handmade corn tortillas or wrapped, northern-style, in flour tortillas as burritos. 

--Rajas arrive soft and smoky. 

--Calabacitas catch the sweetness of squash. 

--Chorizo with nopales carries richness and green acidity in the same mouthful. 

--Cochinita, steak ranchera, shrimp ranchero and turkey mole may join the rotation, depending upon the season and what the farm provides. 

 There is nothing accidental about the apparent simplicity. González grew up in Rosarito, Baja California, and his cooking draws on those flavors as well as pre-Hispanic techniques and traditions from across Mexico. 

The kitchen also looks outward. One mole traces the Filipino influence that reached Mexico through the Manila-Acapulco galleon trade, when ships crossed the Pacific for 250 years carrying people, ingredients and ideas between Asia and New Spain. 

At Mesa Agricola, history is not presented as a lecture. It arrives as sauce. That may explain why the Times described the food as “surprisingly tectonic.” The phrase suits a restaurant where the visible architecture is modest but the plates rest upon deeper layers: 

Baja childhood, Mexican regional cooking, Pacific trade, San Diego County agriculture and the daily labor of making tortillas by hand. 

The flavors shift beneath one another, yet the food remains direct enough to eat standing at the counter if every chair is taken. The recognition completes a remarkably quick ascent. 

Mesa Agricola opened in August 2025 after González and Strom had built a following through a residency at Vino Carta in Solana Beach. The permanent Escondido shop brought the idea closer to the source, placing a farm-minded Mexican kitchen in a North County city whose surrounding valleys still grow food even as subdivisions press outward. 

 The restaurant’s location also matters. Escondido has long lived in the shadow of San Diego’s coastal dining rooms, where ocean views and polished design can command attention before a plate lands. 

Mesa Agricola reverses that equation. Its glamour is the deep red of a beet preparation, the char on a tortilla, the green tangle of herbs and seeds scattered at the last moment. 

The room asks almost nothing of the eye so the food can ask everything of the palate. National praise will make an already busy lunch line longer. It should also focus attention on a model that sounds obvious and remains difficult to execute: grow excellent produce nearby, cook it with cultural memory and technical confidence, charge prices that allow neighbors to return, and resist burying the result beneath decoration. 

Mesa Agricola means, roughly, an agricultural table. The name is not branding so much as a statement of method. The farm and restaurant are separate places, but they operate as one kitchen. Twelve miles of North County road connect them. The Times recognition merely confirms what diners at those six tables have already discovered: sometimes the most consequential meals begin long before the cook lights the fire. 

 MESA AGRICOLA • 707 S. Escondido Boulevard, Escondido • mesaagricola.com 

Wednesday, September 16, 2026

DESIGN / LUCAS MUSEUM READY FOR LIFT-OFF IN LOS ANGELES


After 17 years of planning, rejected sites and construction delays, George Lucas’s $1-billion Lucas Museum of Narrative Art will open this September 22 in Exposition Park, giving Los Angeles a dramatic new landmark that appears ready to lift off. 

Designed by Ma Yansong and his Beijing firm, MAD Architects, the five-story, 300,000-square-foot building resembles a silver spacecraft hovering above an 11-acre park. Yansong says clouds and tree canopies—not “Star Wars”—inspired its sweeping form. 

Landscape architect Mia Lehrer transformed a former asphalt parking lot into gardens, paths and groves containing more than 200 trees. Inside are 100,000 square feet of galleries devoted to pictures that tell stories. Lucas (left) and his wife, Mellody Hobson, founded the museum to give illustration, comics, photography and cinematic design the standing traditionally reserved for fine art. 

Opening displays range from Norman Rockwell, Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera to Jack Kirby, Banksy, children’s illustration and manga. R2-D2, C-3PO, costumes, models and concept art appear in the cinema galleries, but Lucas’s film creations occupy only part of a collection exceeding 40,000 objects. 

The campus also includes two theaters, a research library, classrooms, a restaurant, café and public gathering spaces. Lucas began collecting art in the 1970s and pursued a museum for nearly two decades. His proposal for San Francisco’s Presidio failed to win approval. A later plan for Chicago’s lakefront collapsed amid a lawsuit. 

Los Angeles was selected in 2017, and construction began in 2018. An anticipated 2021 debut slipped because of the pandemic, supply-chain problems and the building’s complexity. 

Opening day will conclude a saga as persistent as Lucas’s films. More importantly, it will introduce his “people’s art” museum, built on the belief that a newspaper photograph, comic panel or movie costume can shape memory as powerfully as a painting. 

Tuesday, September 15, 2026

SOAP BOX / THIS BLOG IS OFFERING A FREE IDEA TO OUR GOVERNMENT BRAINTRUST THAT WILL GENERATE $107, 389,778 OR MORE PER YEAR


By the Editors and Illustrators of PillartoPost.org.
  Right now the USA does not charge a fee or toll to enter our country via car, bus, truck, motorcycle.  What if we charged a $1 toll per vehicle per trip to cross into the USA.  Hell, we pay $10 toll to cross the Golden Gate Bridge.   Check the stats we publish below.  One hundred million per year is not all the money in the world, but it would go a long way to help pay for the cost of maintaining our border.   We are so curious to learn why this idea won't fly?   Ask Congress.  Sorry, no exemptions, either.  Everyone pays.

The facts:

In 2025, approximately 107.4 million road vehicles entered the United States through official land-border crossings: Personal vehicles: 94,385,166 Commercial trucks: 12,856,744 Buses: 147,868 Total: 107,389,778 inbound vehicle crossings That averages about 294,000 vehicles per day. These figures cover vehicles entering from Mexico and Canada. The federal government does not publish a comparable nationwide count for outbound vehicles, so an authoritative two-way total is unavailable. A rough estimate would approach 215 million crossings in both directions, but that is not an official figure. U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics 

Monday, September 14, 2026

MEDIA MONDAY / IF OIL CAN CROSS THE DESERT, WHY CAN’T WATER?

Very well. If private industry and government can find a route, financing, permits and political will to move petroleum across deserts and state lines, why can’t the United States apply the same seriousness to water? 

California’s new gasoline pipeline ought to reopen an old national question 

 By the Editors of PillartoPost.org 

California has just supplied the nation with a wonderfully inconvenient comparison. Phillips 66, Kinder Morgan and HF Sinclair are proceeding with the $5 billion Western Gateway Pipeline, a 1,300-mile system intended to bring gasoline, diesel and jet fuel from Midwestern and Gulf Coast refining centers to Arizona and California. 

About 900 miles of new pipe will run from Borger, Texas, to Phoenix. An existing line from Phoenix to Colton will be reversed so fuel can flow west into California. 

The projected capacity is 230,000 barrels a day, with service planned for 2029. 

 Very well. If private industry and government can find a route, financing, permits and political will to move petroleum across deserts and state lines, why can’t the United States apply the same seriousness to water? 

Why must communities dependent on the Colorado River continue arguing over a diminishing supply while floodwater elsewhere pours toward the sea? 

 The short answer is that we can build a water pipeline. The longer and more honest answer is that water is not gasoline. Gasoline can be bought from a willing refinery and sold into a national market. 

Water is governed by state law, interstate compacts, federal treaties, tribal rights, court decrees and environmental rules. 

The phrase “plenty of water” also requires care. A river that looks abundant during spring floods may already be committed to farms, cities, navigation, hydropower, fisheries and downstream ecosystems. 

The Great Lakes states, for example, generally prohibit new diversions outside their basin. Northern states are unlikely to surrender water merely because the Southwest asks politely—and they should not be expected to. 

 Then comes physics. A gallon of gasoline and a gallon of water weigh roughly the same, but a thirsty region needs water in volumes that dwarf its fuel shipments. Western Gateway’s 230,000 barrels a day equals about 9.7 million gallons. That sounds enormous until one remembers that a single acre-foot of water contains about 326,000 gallons. 

The pipeline’s entire daily liquid volume would amount to only about 30 acre-feet of water—roughly 11,000 acre-feet a year. 

The Colorado River system is measured in millions of acre-feet. A useful water line would therefore need to be far larger, and pumping water uphill toward the Continental Divide or over other high terrain would consume a formidable amount of electricity. 

 None of that makes the idea foolish. It makes the idea a national infrastructure question instead of a barroom sketch on a cocktail napkin. 

 California’s existing 705-mile State Water Project is not an answer to this proposal. It moves water within California; it does not bring a new supply into the state or the Colorado River Basin. 

Worse, its Northern California source rises and falls with the same western climate that produces the shortage. In dry years there is less water available to send south, and water rights, endangered species protections, Delta conditions and reservoir levels restrict what can be moved. 

The aqueduct works. The source is finite. A longer straw in the same half-empty glass does not fill the glass. 

 The question, therefore, is specifically about an interstate, interbasin transfer: new water brought from outside the drought-stricken Colorado River watershed. The Missouri or Mississippi river systems and carefully limited Pacific Northwest flood flows have all been proposed at various times. 

The Great Lakes are effectively foreclosed because their interstate compact generally prohibits diversions outside that basin. No source should be declared “plentiful” until the donor states, tribes, downstream users and ecosystems have been fully accounted for. This is not an engineering fantasy. The Bureau of Reclamation examined a Missouri River import option in its Colorado River Basin study. 

One concept envisioned more than 700 miles of conveyance, delivery of roughly 600,000 acre-feet a year and more than 700 megawatts of pumping power. It scored poorly because of cost, energy, permitting and legal risk—not because water cannot physically be moved. That federal work is now more than a decade old while the Colorado River’s condition has become markedly worse. 

 Congress should authorize an updated Interstate Water Import Commission, jointly led by the Bureau of Reclamation and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Its assignment should not be another general discussion of western conservation. It should determine whether genuinely available water—not politically invented “surplus”—can be imported from the Missouri, Mississippi, Columbia or another out-of-basin source. 

Every route should publish the same facts: acre-feet delivered, energy required, construction cost, environmental damage, tribal and interstate consent, effect on donor communities, and the price of water at the receiving end. The commission must include the seven Colorado River Basin states, potential donor states, Mexico, affected tribes, farming districts, cities and environmental representatives. Tribal nations cannot be invited after engineers have drawn the route; their rights and knowledge belong at the first meeting. Nor can the project become an excuse for the Southwest to avoid conservation. 

No donor state will support a transfer if the receiving states appear determined to preserve every wasteful practice indefinitely. 

 A pipeline also cannot be the only answer. 

The quickest new “source” of Colorado River water is water no longer wasted. Federal and state policy should pay farmers to install more efficient irrigation where it produces real savings; help cities repair leaking systems; accelerate advanced wastewater purification; expand groundwater recharge during wet years; and build desalination where the economics and marine impacts make sense. 

The Bureau of Reclamation is already investing in recycling, storage, conveyance and desalination. Those programs should be treated as parts of one water-security plan, not scattered demonstrations. 

 Agriculture will necessarily be at the table because it uses most of the Colorado River’s consumed water, but “take it from the farmers” is not a policy. Farm communities feed the country and cannot simply be erased. The workable approach is compensation for verified conservation, changes in the thirstiest crops where feasible, improved canals and irrigation systems, and voluntary transfers protected by rules that do not leave rural towns behind. The gasoline project offers one last lesson: it advanced when companies secured customers willing to sign long-term contracts. 

A water project will also require committed buyers. 

Metropolitan agencies, irrigation districts, states and the federal government must decide how much dependable water is worth and guarantee enough revenue to finance construction. 

The federal role should cover national benefits and protect the public interest; beneficiaries should pay a fair share. There should be no blank check. 

 So, yes: ask the pipeline question. 

Ask it loudly. 

If America can spend $5 billion to move refined petroleum 1,300 miles because California’s fuel market is isolated, it can spend a serious fraction of that intellectual and political energy determining whether water can be moved to a river system serving 40 million people. 

 But begin with truth. 

There is no magic northern faucet waiting to be opened, and a steel pipe cannot manufacture water. A national study may conclude that one continental megaproject is inferior to several regional connections, recycling plants, reservoirs and conservation agreements. That would still be valuable. 

The scandal is not that America has failed to approve a particular water pipeline. 

The scandal is that, after watching the Colorado River decline for decades, we still have no fully priced, openly debated national plan comparing every credible way to add water and reduce demand. 

 Western Gateway proves that long distance, high cost and multiple jurisdictions do not automatically kill an infrastructure idea. They merely demand a customer, a contract and a decision. 

 Water deserves at least that much urgency. 

 RESEARCH SOURCES

 • Phillips 66, Kinder Morgan and HF Sinclair, Western Gateway final investment decision, Aug. 11, 2026 

 • California Department of Water Resources, State Water Project reliability 

 • U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Missouri River import option

 • U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Colorado River Post-2026 Operations 

 • U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, water recycling, storage and conveyance investments • Great Lakes–St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Council, Compact overview 

Illustration: Concept: PillartoPost.org; Execution: Chatgpt

Sunday, September 13, 2026

SUNDAY REVIEW/ ISLE OF WRONG /ORIGINAL FICTION

Illustration by PillarToPost.org / F. Stop Fitzgerald.

THE ISLE OF WRONG 

By Thomas Shess 

It was the kind of islands north and west of Belfast, where inbred secrets drifted in with the fog and stayed long after the tide went out. 

    Danny Halvors returned to the Better Islands in long sleeves and without a parade. The Royal Navy had discharged him with a medal, a pension, a limp, and arms scarred from wrist to shoulder after a fire in a submarine galley. He had dragged two shipmates through smoke and burning oil before anyone reached him. His gloves had saved his hands. Nothing had saved the rest. 

    Three years of surgery, therapy, and dreams in which the hatch would not open had made him quiet. He was thirty now. He had learned how quickly admiration became pity once people saw what courage had cost. 
    
    The Better Islands—two gray knots in a hard sea—had not changed. The Larger sited the village while the Smaller tended the farms. Anyone born there who suffered a run of bad luck called them the Bitter Isles. Ferries still ran late. Fishing boats knocked drunkenly against the piers. The plant outside the village still smelled of herring, diesel, and men losing arguments with the future. 

    Danny avoided the village and took a berth on a trawler working the outer grounds. After the catches, he gutted fish. At night he slept in a narrow bunk and imagined a room in Dublin where no one knew his name. 

    He never heard Maureen Glass had taken over her father’s place, a tidy café steps from the ferry landing and across the quay from the harbor. 

     Once, before the Navy, they had been close enough for the islands to expect a wedding and shy enough never to discuss one. 

    Then Danny had gone to sea. Letters became Christmas cards, and Christmas cards became silence. 

    Constable Avery Wolden knew all of that. Wolden had arrived from London two years earlier with polished boots, a vague story about wanting simpler police work, and the habit of drinking before noon. 

    He had courted Maureen before and after his divorce with the patience of a man who mistook persistence for charm. 

    She refused him gently, which he could not fathom. To him, it was an unsolved mystery why she found him lacking. 

    To her, it was plain as his face. He was a drunk. 

    When word reached him that Danny had finally returned, Wolden asked Maureen to come to the station. He poured whiskey into his tea and left the bottle on the desk between them. “You ought to know something before you see Halvors,” he said. 

    Maureen watched him. “What sort of something?” 

    “He wasn’t discharged because of the fire. That’s the story he tells.” 

    “And the truth being?” 

    Wolden lowered his voice. “Portersfield Prison in Inverness. Indecency. A woman complained. Her young daughter was in the house. Twas a miracle he was pardoned." 

    Maureen’s face changed, though only slightly. “You are certain?” 

    “I read the file myself.” The lie was detailed enough to sound official and ugly enough to discourage questions. It worked because Wolden wore a uniform, because Danny had not written, and because Maureen had spent years teaching herself that she had never mattered to him. 

    When Danny finally entered the café, she received him with the brittle courtesy reserved for strangers and people who had disappointed you beyond repair. 

    He felt the distance before she finished pouring his tea. “It’s good to see you, Maureen.” 

    “A long time has passed, Danny Halvors.” No welcome shone in those green eyes. 

    She returned to her book at the far end of the counter. 

    Danny left half the tea untouched and did not say goodbye. 

***
A fortnight later, Danny's boss, the trawler captain and his wife stopped at the café while the boat took on fuel. The captain’s wife noticed a framed colored photo
hung behind the counter: Two redheads: Maureen and Danny at seventeen, squinting into the sun on the seawall. 

    “There he is,” she said. “Best man aboard, and I include my husband only because he pays me.” 

    The captain grunted into his mug. 

    “Danny?” Maureen asked. 

    The wife replied,“That’s him in the photograph. Is that you beside him?” 

    “Once he was my beau.” 

    “Good man," the wife said. "The lads aboard our trawler would follow him into hell. Years ago, two already did, near enough. He pulled them out of that submarine fire. The Navy gave him a medal. We are lucky to have him.” 

    Maureen set down the coffeepot. “Too bad he went to prison.” 

    The woman stared at her. “Our Danny? Danny Halvors was never in prison.” 

    “Not many men with that name on these islands” Maureen offered. 

    “His prison was eighteen months in a naval hospital and another year learning to use his arms again. You have the wrong man.” 

    Maureen looked through the window toward the police station across the square. “Please ask him to come see me,” she said. “I need to know the truth.” 

    The captain’s wife delivered the message when she returned to the trawler. 

    Danny interrupted her, “She was cold enough to freeze the tea in my cup,” 

    “She heard you had done time in Inverness." 

     Danny straightened. “Nae. That's not true. I've never spent a day in jail." 

    “Then clear it up. She asked to see you.” 

    That evening Danny crossed the quay toward the café, hope showing despite his care to hide it. Through the window he saw Wolden seated at the counter, he had just told her a jailhouse joke and then for his reward the constable placed a hand over hers. 

    Danny turned his head. He did not see Maureen pull her hand away. He did not hear her say she had learned Inverness Prison had no record of Danny being there.

    Danny only saw the hand, the smile that she had forced on her face and mistook all he saw as proof that his years away had settled themselves without him. 

    Danny turned back toward the harbor as fog swallowed the last of the light. 

    Inside, Maureen faced Wolden. “Bring me the file on Danny. I want to see it." 

    “How'd you learn of such files. Prisons won't release them without a court order and besides Police records aren’t café reading.” 

    “I've a cousin, a guard inside Inverness never heard of a Danny Halvors and that honest man has worked there for decades." 

    “You’re making too much of this.” 

    That was when she knew. 
*** 
The trawler sailed before dawn, and rough weather kept the boats out for twelve days. When a cracked fuel line finally forced them home, Danny went ashore to the Co-op for provisions. He stopped at Todd Morrow's public house across from the Constabulary. The landlord set down the glass but kept his hand over it. “This house doesn’t serve rapists.” 

    "Todd, how long have you known me? Could I do such a thing?" Danny shook his head. 

    Wolden sat at the end of the bar, smiling into his whiskey. 

    Danny looked from one man to the other. “Who told you that?” 

    “Official records,” Wolden spoke up, “You can’t hide from records.” 

    Danny had survived fire, but he had no wish to survive an island determined to believe the worst of him. The next morning, he had decided to accept an offer he had twice refused from an old shipmate opening a small restaurant near Connolly Station in Dublin. 

        Danny had cooked aboard submarines before the fire. In a kitchen, his hands still knew what to do. He reached the ferry landing before mid-morning with his duffel beside him. The next boat would take him to Belfast; from there he would catch the train south. 

    A child’s scream cut through the gulls. 

    A seven-year-old had fallen between the pier and a fishing boat. His ankle was caught in a mooring line, and each swell dragged him beneath the black water. 

    Men shouted instructions from the wharf. A woman ran toward the police station calling for Wolden. An older woman dialed her phone.

    Danny was already pulling off his coat. 

    The cold North sea struck like iron. He went under once, found the boy’s leg, and freed the rope before both lost their breath. 

    Danny surfaced with the child against his chest just as a thick rope flew at them.

    Hands reached down. Someone took the boy. Others hauled Danny onto the pier, his sleeves pushed to his shoulders, the ruined skin of his arms exposed to the whole village. 

    For a moment no one spoke. 

    Then the boy began to cough. A cheer went up. The growing crowd carried both into Glass Café. 

    Maureen wrapped the child in tablecloths and knelt beside Danny as he shivered on the floor. “I know Wolden lied,” she said. 

    Danny looked at her. 

    “But you believed him.” 

    She did not defend herself. “Yes.” 

    The single word hurt more than an excuse would have. 

    Wolden arrived--his breath reeked of whiskey-- his coat unbuttoned and his hair damp and badly combed. 

    The boy’s mother demanded to know where he had been. "Sleeping it off again, in Todd Morrrow's back room," she added. 

     “Fie, woman! I was on police business,” he insisted. 

     “I rang the station six times.” 
 
    “The telephone must have been out.” 
 
    “It rang,” she said. “No one answered.” 

    "I was out on a call," he said pounding the bar with his fist. 

     Todd Morrow spoke up. He had come over to witness the hubbub. "Aye, he was sleeping it off in my back room." 

     Maureen stood. “Why did you tell me Danny Halvors had been in Inverness Prison?” 

     Wolden looked at Danny on the floor, then at the faces gathered around him. “I warned you about a man with a questionable history.” 

     “You said you had read his file.” 

     “I said there was information.” 

     “You named the prison,” Maureen said. “You named the offense. You said a woman and her daughter were involved.” 

     Wolden’s face tightened. “Mind yourself, Miss Glass” 

     Many in the room had heard the threat in his voice before. It silenced the room for a moment. Then the captain’s wife shouted from the doorway. “Show us the file.” 

     “Police records are none of your concern.” 

     “They will concern the mainland sergeant,” she said. “I telephoned him before coming here.” 

     Wolden glanced toward the window. The ferry from the mainland had not yet appeared, but everyone in the café understood that it would. 

     Todd Morrow moved up to Wolden. "You told me Danny had been convicted.” 

     “I repeated what I heard.” 

     “You told me it came from official records.” 

     Other voices followed. A fisherman said Wolden had threatened to revoke his license after an argument. A widow said he had entered her cottage without permission. 

    The boy’s mother said he had ignored three earlier complaints about the loose mooring line. 

     Wolden raised his hands. “You people were happy enough with me yesterday. Now you're barking at me like wild dogs."

     "Avery, I wouldn't ask for a vote on that right now," Morrow said. 

     No one answered. But the barman's words struck hard. Wolden reached for his cap. “I’ll answer questions when someone with authority asks them.” 

*** 
The mainland sergeant arrived on the afternoon ferry accompanied by another constable. He questioned a roomful: Maureen, Todd Morrow, the boy’s mother, and anyone else willing to remain. 

    By dusk, Wolden had been relieved of duty pending an inquiry into false statements, intimidation, neglect of duty, and several earlier complaints the islanders had once been too frightened to make. 

     Danny declined to press charges. 
     
    “That may not matter,” the sergeant said. “This stopped being only your grievance the moment he used his badge to spread the lie.” 

    Mid-evening Danny collected his duffel and boarded the last ferry. Maureen followed him to its gate. “Stay one more night,” she said. 

    “For what?” 

    “So I can explain.” 

    “You believed I could do that to a woman and a child. All of you did.” 

    Her eyes filled, but she held his gaze. “I was angry that you vanished without a word. Believing the worst was easier than admitting I still cared.” 

    The ferry deckhand lifted the chain across the gangway. Danny picked up his duffel. “That may be the truth, Maureen. It isn’t the same as an apology.” 

    He boarded without looking back. 

*** 
Three months later, on a wet Thursday in Dublin, Danny stood at the stove in a narrow restaurant near Connolly Station, reducing onions for the lunch service. The scars along his arms had become ordinary to the kitchen staff. No one stared anymore unless he burned the sauce. 

    A waiter came through the swing door. “Woman at table six asking for you.” 

    “Tell her the chef is busy.” 

    “She’s come from one of those northern islands and looks capable of waiting until the sea goes dry.” 

    Danny grinned, "I know such women," wiped his hands and stepped into the dining room. 

    Maureen sat alone beside the window. She had no luggage beyond a small overnight case. On the table lay the faded Kodak image from behind the café counter and an envelope containing a copy of her statement to the mainland police. 

    “How did you find me?” he asked. 

    “Your captain’s wife. Loyal, but not discreet.” 

    He remained standing. 

    “I sold the café,” Maureen said. “Not because I expect anything from you. I was tired of serving people who knew Wolden lied and said nothing.” 

    Danny looked through the rain-streaked window. “Where will you go?” 

    “I thought I might begin with breakfast.” 

    A corner of his mouth moved.

     “I was wrong about you,” she said. “Worse, I wanted to believe the lie because it excused me from being hurt. I cannot ask you to forget that. I came to tell you to your face that I am sorry.” 

    Danny sat across from her. He let the silence remain between them for a while.    “Breakfast is over,” he said. 

    “Lunch, then.” She didn't say please. Her hands touched his arms.

    He looked at the old photograph, then at the woman who had carried it across the sea. “Lunch I can manage.” 
*** 

FOR MORE FREE SHORT STORIES BY THE AUTHOR: WWW.THOMASSHESS.COM