![]() |
| The truth stand firm while lies melt like a Dali painting |
SOME DID, SOME DIDN'T
Check out the Poynter Report:
GUEST BLOG / By senior media writer Tom Jones at tjones@poynter.org--The President last Thursday gave a rambling 22-minute speech in which he cast doubts on the results of the 2020 election and also made a variety of accusations about the safety of elections in the U.S.
Here’s how The New York Times’ Maggie Haberman described it: “President Trump made at times outlandish claims about the safety of American voting systems drawing selectively from documents his aides published online to falsely claim elections were ‘rigged’ and ‘stolen.’” Among Trump’s accusations was that China tried to influence the 2020 election. Haberman added, “Mr. Trump, who has in recent months increasingly pressed his yearslong and unsubstantiated argument that the outcomes of U.S. elections have been tampered with, also laid out a purported effort by the Chinese government to undermine him in 2019. But the documents posted by the White House, although heavily redacted, were far more guarded in their conclusions.”
Trump has never claimed anything wrong with the 2016 and 2024 elections, which he won, but has centered on unproven conspiracy theories about the 2020 election, which he lost to Joe Biden. So eyebrows were immediately raised when reports broke this week that Trump would use Thursday night’s address to talk about election integrity less than four months from a midterm election that, as of now, seems ominous for Republicans. In the days leading up to Thursday night’s address, there were questions about just how factual Trump’s address would be.
Even before the speech, CNN’s John King said on air, “Sadly, we have no choice but to be skeptical when this president talks about elections because what he says, at least what he has said in the past, is often just not true.”
Before the speech, MS NOW’s Chris Hayes said, “It has become abundantly clear that Donald Trump would rather cheat than win. His primetime speech tonight is another example of that.” Because of all the discourse beforehand, there were questions about whether or not TV networks would air Trump’s address. And just as many conversations about whether TV networks should air Trump’s speech. So how did it all play out?
Earlier on Thursday, NBC and ABC announced they were not going to air the address live on their main networks. Instead, they chose to air it on their streaming news channels: NBC News NOW and ABC News Live.
NBC did, however, break into regular programming after the speech to go over what Trump said.
ABC said it would only break into programming after the speech if news warranted. Ultimately, the network did break in after Trump finished with a recap of the speech and a panel discussion.
But Trump criticized NBC and ABC for not carrying the address live on their main networks, saying they should have their licenses revoked. He said, “They and others in the media are part of a plot. They want to continue this fraud for whatever reason. They want to keep it going. They want to protect the radical left. They can’t have a great country. And that’s true. You can’t have a great country without free and fair elections.
However, all media eyes were focused on what CBS would do. CBS’s parent company, Paramount, owned by Trump ally David Ellison, who is in the midst of a controversial acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery — a merger that requires approval from the Trump administration.
So what did CBS News do? They tried to straddle the line. They did break into regular programming with a special report, but, at the start, they didn’t air the speech in real time. “CBS Evening News” anchor Tony Dokoupil hosted the coverage and said Trump was expected to talk about election integrity. “And honestly,” Dokoupil said, “much of what this president has said on this topic has been false.” Then Dokoupil and CBS seemingly tried to get ahead of any criticism of showing Trump’s speech. Dokoupil said, “There’s an argument that it is irresponsible to air the president’s speech tonight. But this speech will be made, it will be news and it’s our job to cover the news.”
Eventually, the network did go live to Trump for several minutes. But, as Trump rambled, CBS cut away again and went back to a discussion. CBS also did some fact-checking, and they allowed Trump administration advisor, John Solomon, to come on the air to make Trump’s case.
By 10 p.m. Eastern, an hour after Trump began his speech, the major networks had returned to regular programming. As far as the cable news networks, it was all over the place. To no one’s surprise, Fox and Fox News — networks traditionally and clearly supportive of Trump and the Republican Party — aired the speech in full.
However, it should be noted that Sean Hannity’s show, which was preempted for the Trump speech, spent very little time on the speech after it was over. Hannity quickly pivoted to the war in Iran, followed by stories about wildfires up north and floods down south. It also should be noted that Trump made claims about electronic voting machines being vulnerable and easily compromised.
Fox News White House correspondent Aishah Hasnie acknowledged that they had not seen evidence of that and were not in the position to evaluate the accuracy of Trump’s claims.
CNN did not air the speech. Instead, CNN monitored the speech and then reported on it after it was over. While Trump was talking, CNN’s panel discussed what Trump was talking about.
MS NOW started to air the speech live. However, it pulled out after about 15 minutes. Anchor Jen Psaki immediately started fact-checking Trump, and he was joined by panelists who also poked major holes in Trump’s claims.
***
There you have it, another night of networks trying to figure out how to cover a president who often makes claims that simply are not true or, at the very least, are misleading. And while there is no easy answer on how to cover Trump in times like these, the responsible networks ultimately did a good job of covering Thursday’s address without amplifying, to borrow Haberman’s wording, Trump’s “outrageous” claims.
***
MEANWHILE IN OTHER NEWS:
Wanna make a sure bet?
Here is a story that is so 2026. Gabriel Perez, the person who runs the teleprompter for the White House, is being investigated for allegedly using insider information to place bets on what President Donald Trump would talk about in speeches, including the State of the Union.
It’s believed that Perez, who has worked at the White House since 2016, might have won $100,000 using his insider information to place bets on which words Trump would use in speeches.
He made the trades with Kalshi, a prediction markets platform where users can bet on real-world events.
ABC News reported, “According to the sources, Kalshi alerted its regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, to the suspicious activity on its ‘Mentions’ market, where users can bet on whether specific words, phrases or topics are uttered during a public speech.”
Kalshi's head of enforcement, Bobby DeNault, said in a statement to ABC News. "Our surveillance team promptly flagged and referred these trades to the CFTC, and we are cooperating and assisting regulators.”
NPR’s Bobby Allyn wrote, “Prediction markets allow people to bet on elections, global policy or even what color tie the president will wear. The markets have exploded in growth in recent months, leading to several instances of high-profile insider trading. But this marks the first time someone inside the White House has been investigated for allegedly abusing that access for prediction market profits.”
Reports are that Kalshi traders had already wagered nearly $1 million on whether or not Trump, in his national address Thursday night, would use certain words, such as “Hormuz,” or “rigged election,” or “fake news.”
Allyn wrote, “In the case of Perez, Kalshi's surveillance systems detected unusual betting on ‘mention’ markets involving the president that did not follow typical behavior, and when the company examined the accounts behind it, investigators saw that he was a federal employee, according to a source with direct knowledge of the inquiry.”
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday morning that Trump was aware of the teleprompter investigation, adding that Trump “believes it’s deeply unfortunate and frankly a disgrace.”
Speaking of Leavitt Leavitt’s press briefing on Thursday was her first full briefing in nearly two months. She left on maternity leave at the end of April and gave birth to a daughter on May 1. It’s the second child for her and her husband, Nicholas Riccio.
Leavitt started her remarks by saying, “Let’s get back to work.” A frightening scene at “Today” There was a scary moment at NBC’s “Today” show on Thursday. Around 9 a.m., a man made his way into the NBC studio at Rockefeller Plaza and confronted “Today” co-host Craig Melvin.
The man reportedly yelled racial slurs towards Melvin, who is Black.
TMZ reported that a man originally asked for “Today” co-host Al Roker after somehow slipping through security. TMZ said the man then allegedly lunged at Melvin.
NBC News put out a statement on Thursday that said, “There was a security incident this morning at the TODAY show studio. An individual entered an unauthorized area in a vestibule near Studio 1A. The person approached anchor Craig Melvin, who alerted security. The individual was detained and taken into custody by law enforcement without further incident. There was no altercation, and no one was injured. TODAY is cooperating fully with law enforcement as they investigate the matter. NBC and TODAY take the safety and security of our employees, talent, staff and guests extremely seriously. We are reviewing the incident and our security protocols and remain committed to providing a safe and secure environment for everyone who works at and visits our studios.”
Media news, tidbits and interesting links
--Associated Press: “ICE officer in Maine shooting has history of violent behavior, family and records say.”
--ProPublica’s Corey G. Johnson with “FCC Officials Took Pricey Gifts From Paramount as the Company Needed Approval for Billion-Dollar Deals.”
--New York Times chief legal correspondent Adam Liptak with “Could a 50-Year-Old Case Thwart Trump’s Attacks on the News Media?”
--The Associated Press’ Barbara Ortutay and Alexandra Olson with “26 Meta employees sue, alleging AI-driven layoff picks hit workers on medical and parental leave.”
--Axios’ Sara Fischer with “Truth Social to license its data to Wall Street.” Chloe Fineman, who has been on “Saturday Night Live” for seven seasons, announced on Instagram Thursday that she is leaving the show. In a lengthy post, she said in part, “It’s cliche to say this but working at SNL has been the greatest privilege of my life. I still can’t really believe I got to be a part of it. I fell in love with the place the second I walked through the door. Lorne (if you’re reading this on your burner account) I want you to know that I am forever in your debt.” Lorne is “SNL” executive producer Lorne Michaels.
--The Wall Street Journal’s Jessica Toonkel with “Netflix Revenue and Profit Increase, But the Company Expects Growth to Slow.”
--Variety’s Brian Steinberg with “‘Status Summit’ Aims to Deliver More Content From Oliver Darcy’s ‘Status’ Media Newsletter.”
--Sports Business Journal’s Austin Karp reports that Monday night' s Major League Baseball Home Run Derby event drew around 5.3 million viewers on Netflix. (This is the first time Netflix or any streamer has aired the event.) That would be the lowest audience for the Home Run Derby since 2003 (5.2 million). Last year, 5.7 million watched on ESPN.
--Poynter’s Phoenix Chapital with “When the World Cup came to Kansas City, local journalists stayed local.”
--The Athletic’s Jayna Bardahl with “How Erin Andrews, Charissa Thompson built an NFL podcast that goes beyond football.”
And finally, to get you ready for Sunday’s World Cup final between Argentina and Spain, here’s an updated version of a story first published in 2024. It’s The Athletic’s Dermot Corrigan with “The remarkable story of Lionel Messi’s meeting with a baby Lamine Yamal.” More resources for journalists Get access to top courses and members-only webinars, including The 5 W’s of Research, starting July 29. Join Poynter for $50 (regularly $75) with code SUMMER through August 31. Sign up now. Strengthen your investigative reporting with Will Work for Impact: Fundamentals of Investigative Journalism. Enroll now. Join our first Leading AI in the Newsroom course, beginning with an in-person workshop in Los Angeles. Learn to build trust, drive adoption and lead AI initiatives while upholding journalistic values. Apply now.
Have feedback or a tip? Email Poynter senior media writer Tom Jones at tjones@poynter.org.
The Poynter Report is your daily dive into the world of media, packed with the latest news and insights.

