Total Pageviews

Monday, March 23, 2026

A BIRTHDAY TO REMEMBER BEFORE THE WORLD TURNED A FOUL ORANGE

The student, faculty string ensemble from the Escuela de Arte Benny More in Cienfuegos, Cuba play for U.S. tour goers.  It was an honor to be at the school among the students, faculty, artists, art work and music.

On my birthday—one of those markers that sneaks up on you and then lingers—I found myself stepping off a tour bus in Cienfuegos, Cuba, along with twenty fellow travelers and a pair of patient guides who had mastered the art of moving a small crowd through a large country without ever seeming hurried. The bus sighed as it came to rest, doors folding open, and we spilled out into the warm, slightly salted air of a coastal city that carries itself with quiet dignity. 

There was nothing ceremonial about the stop. No banners, no speeches, no sense that anything had been arranged for our benefit beyond the courtesy of being allowed in. 

Ahead stood a low, practical building—the Escuela de Arte Benny MorĂ©, though at that moment I did not yet know the name I would later struggle to recall. It looked less like an institution than a place where work happened every day, the kind of place where talent is shaped rather than displayed. 

Inside, the air shifted. The light softened. Hallways filled with red, white and blue clad students of all ages, opened into rooms where the walls carried the marks of many hands—paintings, studies, attempts, corrections. This was not a gallery. It was a living workshop. 

Somewhere deeper in the building, music was already in motion. We were guided into a modest room, the kind that in another life might have been a classroom or meeting space. A handful of chairs, music stands set without ceremony, a piano waiting quietly at the back. 

And there they were: a small string ensemble, students and instructors together, already poised in that half-second of stillness before sound begins. No announcement. No introduction. Just the lift of a bow. And then—music. It was not polished for an audience, which is to say it was real. The kind of playing that carries both discipline and hunger. A violin leaned into a phrase as if testing its edges. The upright bass grounded the room with a steady, human pulse. The piano threaded through it all, less a soloist than a quiet conspirator. You could hear instruction inside the performance, and performance inside the instruction—the two inseparable. 

We sat in a loose semicircle, travelers who had expected to observe and instead found ourselves listening. Really listening. Even our group, not known for silence, seemed to understand that this was not something to interrupt with commentary or cameras. It was a gift offered without fuss, and accepted the same way. I remember thinking—not in words, but in the way a thought settles—that this was among the best birthday celebrations I've received outside of family. No one in that room knew it was El Jefe's birthday. No one needed to. The moment didn’t belong to me; that was precisely why it felt like it did. 

When the final note dissolved, there was a pause—not the polite pause before applause, but the natural one that follows something complete. Then we clapped, of course, because we are who we are. The players smiled, a little shyly, as if surprised by the reaction to something that, for them, was simply part of the day’s work. 

We filed back out the way we had come, returning to the bus, to the road, to the rest of the itinerary that would soon blur with the others. But that room in Cienfuegos has held its shape in memory longer than most places I have deliberately tried to remember. Years later, the name of the school slipped away before returning again, as names do. The music, however, never left. Sadly, as the world has turned a foul orange, I wonder if the school has endured. I'm sad to follow up.

Sunday, March 22, 2026

JUDGE RULES PENTAGON RESTRICTIONS ON PRESS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL


A federal judge tossed parts of the Pentagon's restrictions on news outlets, saying they violated the First Amendment, in a lawsuit brought by The New York Times. 

The judge ordered the press passes of seven journalists for The New York Times to be restored. 

GUEST BLOG / By Erik Wemple, The New York Times reporting from Washinton DC--A federal judge today ruled that the Pentagon's restrictions on news outlets violate the First Amendment and issued an order tossing parts of the department's policy, handing a victory to The New York Times, which filed suit in December over the restrictions. 

Judge Paul Friedman, of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, also ordered the Pentagon to restore the press passes of seven journalists for The Times. They had surrendered those passes in October instead of signing the policy, which empowered the Pentagon to declare journalists "security risks" and revoke their press passes if they engage in any conduct that the Pentagon believes threatens national security. 

A spokesman for The Times said the ruling "reaffirms the right of The Times and other independent media to continue to ask questions on the public's behalf," adding that "Americans deserve visibility into how their government is being run, and the actions the military is taking in their name and with their tax dollars." 

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The Pentagon policy took effect in October and drew condemnations from numerous mainstream outlets for penalizing newsgathering methods long protected by the First Amendment. Dozens of journalists who had press passes to the Pentagon turned them in rather than sign the new policy. The Defense Department then welcomed a new set of credentialed media members, most of them pro-Trump commentators or influencers. 

At a March 6 hearing in the case, Judge Friedman signaled his frustration with the rules. A Justice Department lawyer representing the Defense Department, for instance, drew an animated response from the judge when he argued that journalists don't have First Amendment protections when they solicit the "disclosure of unauthorized information." 

"Why not? Why not?" Judge Friedman replied, adding that department officials can simply refuse to answer such inquiries from journalists, but there is "no proscription" on journalists asking questions. 

Judge Friedman had also appeared skeptical of a provision in the policy declaring off-limits certain journalistic tip requests. Though the Pentagon drew a bright line delineating prohibited tip requests from problematic ones, Judge Friedman said, "I don't understand that argument. I hope that the government can explain it." 

It is unclear whether the government will appeal the ruling. In the March 6 hearing, the Justice Department asked that the court send the rules back to the Defense Department for refining - so that the Pentagon could "rehabilitate the policy" - rather than vacate the disputed provisions. 

PillartoPost.org illustration by F. Stop Fitzgerald