Total Pageviews

Sunday, November 23, 2025

SUNDAY REVIEW / THE DARLING, A SHORT STORY BY ANTON CHEKHOV


THE DARLING 

By Anton Chekhov. First published January 1899.

OLENKA, the daughter of the retired collegiate assessor, Plemyanniakov, was sitting in her back porch, lost in thought. It was hot, the flies were persistent and teasing, and it was pleasant to reflect that it would soon be evening. Dark rainclouds were gathering from the east, and bringing from time to time a breath of moisture in the air. 

 Kukin, who was the manager of an open-air theatre called the Tivoli, and who lived in the lodge, was standing in the middle of the garden looking at the sky. 

 "Again!" he observed despairingly. "It's going to rain again! Rain every day, as though to spite me. I might as well hang myself! It's ruin! Fearful losses every day." 

 He flung up his hands, and went on, addressing Olenka: 

 "There! that's the life we lead, Olga Semyonovna. It's enough to make one cry. One works and does one's utmost, one wears oneself out, getting no sleep at night, and racks one's brain what to do for the best. And then what happens? To begin with, one's public is ignorant, boorish. I give them the very best operetta, a dainty masque, first rate music-hall artists. But do you suppose that's what they want! They don't understand anything of that sort. They want a clown; what they ask for is vulgarity. And then look at the weather! Almost every evening it rains. It started on the tenth of May, and it's kept it up all May and June. It's simply awful! The public doesn't come, but I've to pay the rent just the same, and pay the artists." 

 The next evening the clouds would gather again, and Kukin would say with an hysterical laugh: 

 "Well, rain away, then! Flood the garden, drown me! Damn my luck in this world and the next! Let the artists have me up! Send me to prison!--to Siberia!--the scaffold! Ha, ha, ha!" 

 And next day the same thing. 

 Olenka listened to Kukin with silent gravity, and sometimes tears came into her eyes. In the end his misfortunes touched her; she grew to love him. He was a small thin man, with a yellow face, and curls combed forward on his forehead. He spoke in a thin tenor; as he talked his mouth worked on one side, and there was always an expression of despair on his face; yet he aroused a deep and genuine affection in her. She was always fond of some one, and could not exist without loving. In earlier days she had loved her papa, who now sat in a darkened room, breathing with difficulty; she had loved her aunt who used to come every other year from Bryansk; and before that, when she was at school, she had loved her French master. She was a gentle, soft-hearted, compassionate girl, with mild, tender eyes and very good health. At the sight of her full rosy cheeks, her soft white neck with a little dark mole on it, and the kind, naïve smile, which came into her face when she listened to anything pleasant, men thought, "Yes, not half bad," and smiled too, while lady visitors could not refrain from seizing her hand in the middle of a conversation, exclaiming in a gush of delight, "You darling!" 

 The house in which she had lived from her birth upwards, and which was left her in her father's will, was at the extreme end of the town, not far from the Tivoli. In the evenings and at night she could head the band playing, and the crackling and banging of fireworks, and it seemed to her that it was Kukin struggling with his destiny, storming the entrenchments of his chief foe, the indifferent public; there was a sweet thrill at her heart, she had no desire to sleep, and when he returned home at day-break, she tapped softly at her bedroom window, and showing him only her face and one shoulder through the curtain, she gave him a friendly smile. . . . 

He proposed to her, and they were married. And when he had a closer view of her neck and her plump, fine shoulders, he threw up his hands, and said: 

 "You darling!" He was happy, but as it rained on the day and night of his wedding, his face still retained an expression of despair. 

 They got on very well together. She used to sit in his office, to look after things in the Tivoli, to put down the accounts and pay the wages. And her rosy cheeks, her sweet, naïve, radiant smile, were to be seen now at the office window, now in the refreshment bar or behind the scenes of the theatre. And already she used to say to her acquaintances that the theatre was the chief and most important thing in life and that it was only through the drama that one could derive true enjoyment and become cultivated and humane. 

 "But do you suppose the public understands that?" she used to say. "What they want is a clown. Yesterday we gave 'Faust Inside Out,' and almost all the boxes were empty; but if Vanitchka and I had been producing some vulgar thing, I assure you the theatre would have been packed. Tomorrow Vanitchka and I are doing 'Orpheus in Hell.' Do come." 

 And what Kukin said about the theatre and the actors she repeated. Like him she despised the public for their ignorance and their indifference to art; she took part in the rehearsals, she corrected the actors, she kept an eye on the behaviour of the musicians, and when there was an unfavourable notice in the local paper, she shed tears, and then went to the editor's office to set things right. 

 The actors were fond of her and used to call her "Vanitchka and I," and "the darling"; she was sorry for them and used to lend them small sums of money, and if they deceived her, she used to shed a few tears in private, but did not complain to her husband. 

 They got on well in the winter too. They took the theatre in the town for the whole winter, and let it for short terms to a Little Russian company, or to a conjurer, or to a local dramatic society. Olenka grew stouter, and was always beaming with satisfaction, while Kukin grew thinner and yellower, and continually complained of their terrible losses, although he had not done badly all the winter. He used to cough at night, and she used to give him hot raspberry tea or lime-flower water, to rub him with eau-de-Cologne and to wrap him in her warm shawls. 

 "You're such a sweet pet!" she used to say with perfect sincerity, stroking his hair. "You're such a pretty dear!" 

 Towards Lent he went to Moscow to collect a new troupe, and without him she could not sleep, but sat all night at her window, looking at the stars, and she compared herself with the hens, who are awake all night and uneasy when the cock is not in the hen-house. Kukin was detained in Moscow, and wrote that he would be back at Easter, adding some instructions about the Tivoli. But on the Sunday before Easter, late in the evening, came a sudden ominous knock at the gate; some one was hammering on the gate as though on a barrel-- boom, boom, boom! The drowsy cook went flopping with her bare feet through the puddles, as she ran to open the gate. 

 "Please open," said some one outside in a thick bass. "There is a telegram for you." 

 Olenka had received telegrams from her husband before, but this time for some reason she felt numb with terror. With shaking hands she opened the telegram and read as follows: 

 "IVAN PETROVITCH DIED SUDDENLY TO-DAY. AWAITING IMMATE INSTRUCTIONS FUFUNERAL TUESDAY." That was how it was written in the telegram--"fufuneral," and the utterly incomprehensible word "immate." It was signed by the stage manager of the operatic company. 

 "My darling!" sobbed Olenka. "Vanka, my precious, my darling! Why did I ever meet you! Why did I know you and love you! Your poor heart-broken Olenka is alone without you!" 

 Kukin's funeral took place on Tuesday in Moscow, Olenka returned home on Wednesday, and as soon as she got indoors, she threw herself on her bed and sobbed so loudly that it could be heard next door, and in the street. 

 "Poor darling!" the neighbours said, as they crossed themselves. "Olga Semyonovna, poor darling! How she does take on!" 

 Three months later Olenka was coming home from mass, melancholy and in deep mourning. It happened that one of her neighbours, Vassily Andreitch Pustovalov, returning home from church, walked back beside her. He was the manager at Babakayev's, the timber merchant's. He wore a straw hat, a white waistcoat, and a gold watch-chain, and looked more a country gentleman than a man in trade. 

 "Everything happens as it is ordained, Olga Semyonovna," he said gravely, with a sympathetic note in his voice; "and if any of our dear ones die, it must be because it is the will of God, so we ought have fortitude and bear it submissively." 

 After seeing Olenka to her gate, he said good-bye and went on. All day afterwards she heard his sedately dignified voice, and whenever she shut her eyes she saw his dark beard. She liked him very much. And apparently she had made an impression on him too, for not long afterwards an elderly lady, with whom she was only slightly acquainted, came to drink coffee with her, and as soon as she was seated at table began to talk about Pustovalov, saying that he was an excellent man whom one could thoroughly depend upon, and that any girl would be glad to marry him. Three days later Pustovalov came himself. He did not stay long, only about ten minutes, and he did not say much, but when he left, Olenka loved him--loved him so much that she lay awake all night in a perfect fever, and in the morning she sent for the elderly lady. The match was quickly arranged, and then came the wedding. 

 Pustovalov and Olenka got on very well together when they were married. 

 Usually he sat in the office till dinner-time, then he went out on business, while Olenka took his place, and sat in the office till evening, making up accounts and booking orders. 

 "Timber gets dearer every year; the price rises twenty per cent," she would say to her customers and friends. "Only fancy we used to sell local timber, and now Vassitchka always has to go for wood to the Mogilev district. And the freight!" she would add, covering her cheeks with her hands in horror. "The freight!" 

 It seemed to her that she had been in the timber trade for ages and ages, and that the most important and necessary thing in life was timber; and there was something intimate and touching to her in the very sound of words such as "baulk," "post," "beam," "pole," "scantling," "batten," "lath," "plank," etc. 

 At night when she was asleep she dreamed of perfect mountains of planks and boards, and long strings of wagons, carting timber somewhere far away. She dreamed that a whole regiment of six-inch beams forty feet high, standing on end, was marching upon the timber-yard; that logs, beams, and boards knocked together with the resounding crash of dry wood, kept falling and getting up again, piling themselves on each other. Olenka cried out in her sleep, and Pustovalov said to her tenderly: "Olenka, what's the matter, darling? Cross yourself!" 

 Her husband's ideas were hers. If he thought the room was too hot, or that business was slack, she thought the same. Her husband did not care for entertainments, and on holidays he stayed at home. She did likewise. 

 "You are always at home or in the office," her friends said to her. "You should go to the theatre, darling, or to the circus." 

 "Vassitchka and I have no time to go to theatres," she would answer sedately. "We have no time for nonsense. What's the use of these theatres?" 

 On Saturdays Pustovalov and she used to go to the evening service; on holidays to early mass, and they walked side by side with softened faces as they came home from church. There was a pleasant fragrance about them both, and her silk dress rustled agreeably. At home they drank tea, with fancy bread and jams of various kinds, and afterwards they ate pie. Every day at twelve o'clock there was a savoury smell of beet-root soup and of mutton or duck in their yard, and on fast-days of fish, and no one could pass the gate without feeling hungry. In the office the samovar was always boiling, and customers were regaled with tea and cracknels. Once a week the couple went to the baths and returned side by side, both red in the face. 

 "Yes, we have nothing to complain of, thank God," Olenka used to say to her acquaintances. "I wish every one were as well off as Vassitchka and I." 

 When Pustovalov went away to buy wood in the Mogilev district, she missed him dreadfully, lay awake and cried. A young veterinary surgeon in the army, called Smirnin, to whom they had let their lodge, used sometimes to come in in the evening. He used to talk to her and play cards with her, and this entertained her in her husband's absence. She was particularly interested in what he told her of his home life. He was married and had a little boy, but was separated from his wife because she had been unfaithful to him, and now he hated her and used to send her forty roubles a month for the maintenance of their son. And hearing of all this, Olenka sighed and shook her head. She was sorry for him. 

 "Well, God keep you," she used to say to him at parting, as she lighted him down the stairs with a candle. "Thank you for coming to cheer me up, and may the Mother of God give you health." 

 And she always expressed herself with the same sedateness and dignity, the same reasonableness, in imitation of her husband. As the veterinary surgeon was disappearing behind the door below, she would say: 

 "You know, Vladimir Platonitch, you'd better make it up with your wife. You should forgive her for the sake of your son. You may be sure the little fellow understands." 

 And when Pustovalov came back, she told him in a low voice about the veterinary surgeon and his unhappy home life, and both sighed and shook their heads and talked about the boy, who, no doubt, missed his father, and by some strange connection of ideas, they went up to the holy ikons, bowed to the ground before them and prayed that God would give them children. 

 And so the Pustovalovs lived for six years quietly and peaceably in love and complete harmony. 

 But behold! one winter day after drinking hot tea in the office, Vassily Andreitch went out into the yard without his cap on to see about sending off some timber, caught cold and was taken ill. He had the best doctors, but he grew worse and died after four months' illness. And Olenka was a widow once more. 

 "I've nobody, now you've left me, my darling," she sobbed, after her husband's funeral. "How can I live without you, in wretchedness and misery! Pity me, good people, all alone in the world!" 

 She went about dressed in black with long "weepers," and gave up wearing hat and gloves for good. She hardly ever went out, except to church, or to her husband's grave, and led the life of a nun. It was not till six months later that she took off the weepers and opened the shutters of the windows. She was sometimes seen in the mornings, going with her cook to market for provisions, but what went on in her house and how she lived now could only be surmised. People guessed, from seeing her drinking tea in her garden with the veterinary surgeon, who read the newspaper aloud to her, and from the fact that, meeting a lady she knew at the post-office, she said to her: 

 "There is no proper veterinary inspection in our town, and that's the cause of all sorts of epidemics. One is always hearing of people's getting infection from the milk supply, or catching diseases from horses and cows. The health of domestic animals ought to be as well cared for as the health of human beings." 

 She repeated the veterinary surgeon's words, and was of the same opinion as he about everything. It was evident that she could not live a year without some attachment, and had found new happiness in the lodge. In any one else this would have been censured, but no one could think ill of Olenka; everything she did was so natural. Neither she nor the veterinary surgeon said anything to other people of the change in their relations, and tried, indeed, to conceal it, but without success, for Olenka could not keep a secret. When he had visitors, men serving in his regiment, and she poured out tea or served the supper, she would begin talking of the cattle plague, of the foot and mouth disease, and of the municipal slaughterhouses. He was dreadfully embarrassed, and when the guests had gone, he would seize her by the hand and hiss angrily: 

 "I've asked you before not to talk about what you don't understand. When we veterinary surgeons are talking among ourselves, please don't put your word in. It's really annoying." 

 And she would look at him with astonishment and dismay, and ask him in alarm: "But, Voloditchka, what _am_ I to talk about?" 

 And with tears in her eyes she would embrace him, begging him not to be angry, and they were both happy. 

 But this happiness did not last long. The veterinary surgeon departed, departed for ever with his regiment, when it was transferred to a distant place--to Siberia, it may be. And Olenka was left alone. 

 Now she was absolutely alone. Her father had long been dead, and his armchair lay in the attic, covered with dust and lame of one leg. She got thinner and plainer, and when people met her in the street they did not look at her as they used to, and did not smile to her; evidently her best years were over and left behind, and now a new sort of life had begun for her, which did not bear thinking about. In the evening Olenka sat in the porch, and heard the band playing and the fireworks popping in the Tivoli, but now the sound stirred no response. She looked into her yard without interest, thought of nothing, wished for nothing, and afterwards, when night came on she went to bed and dreamed of her empty yard. She ate and drank as it were unwillingly. 

 And what was worst of all, she had no opinions of any sort. She saw the objects about her and understood what she saw, but could not form any opinion about them, and did not know what to talk about. And how awful it is not to have any opinions! One sees a bottle, for instance, or the rain, or a peasant driving in his cart, but what the bottle is for, or the rain, or the peasant, and what is the meaning of it, one can't say, and could not even for a thousand roubles. When she had Kukin, or Pustovalov, or the veterinary surgeon, Olenka could explain everything, and give her opinion about anything you like, but now there was the same emptiness in her brain and in her heart as there was in her yard outside. And it was as harsh and as bitter as wormwood in the mouth. 

 Little by little the town grew in all directions. The road became a street, and where the Tivoli and the timber-yard had been, there were new turnings and houses. How rapidly time passes! Olenka's house grew dingy, the roof got rusty, the shed sank on one side, and the whole yard was overgrown with docks and stinging-nettles. Olenka herself had grown plain and elderly; in summer she sat in the porch, and her soul, as before, was empty and dreary and full of bitterness. In winter she sat at her window and looked at the snow. When she caught the scent of spring, or heard the chime of the church bells, a sudden rush of memories from the past came over her, there was a tender ache in her heart, and her eyes brimmed over with tears; but this was only for a minute, and then came emptiness again and the sense of the futility of life. The black kitten, Briska, rubbed against her and purred softly, but Olenka was not touched by these feline caresses. That was not what she needed. She wanted a love that would absorb her whole being, her whole soul and reason--that would give her ideas and an object in life, and would warm her old blood. And she would shake the kitten off her skirt and say with vexation: 

 "Get along; I don't want you!" 

 And so it was, day after day and year after year, and no joy, and no opinions. Whatever Mavra, the cook, said she accepted. 

 One hot July day, towards evening, just as the cattle were being driven away, and the whole yard was full of dust, some one suddenly knocked at the gate. Olenka went to open it herself and was dumbfounded when she looked out: she saw Smirnin, the veterinary surgeon, grey-headed, and dressed as a civilian. She suddenly remembered everything. She could not help crying and letting her head fall on his breast without uttering a word, and in the violence of her feeling she did not notice how they both walked into the house and sat down to tea. 

 "My dear Vladimir Platonitch! What fate has brought you?" she muttered, trembling with joy. 

 "I want to settle here for good, Olga Semyonovna," he told her. "I have resigned my post, and have come to settle down and try my luck on my own account. Besides, it's time for my boy to go to school. He's a big boy. I am reconciled with my wife, you know." 

 "Where is she?' asked Olenka. "She's at the hotel with the boy, and I'm looking for lodgings." 

 "Good gracious, my dear soul! Lodgings? Why not have my house? Why shouldn't that suit you? Why, my goodness, I wouldn't take any rent!" cried Olenka in a flutter, beginning to cry again. "You live here, and the lodge will do nicely for me. Oh dear! how glad I am!" 

 Next day the roof was painted and the walls were whitewashed, and Olenka, with her arms akimbo walked about the yard giving directions. Her face was beaming with her old smile, and she was brisk and alert as though she had waked from a long sleep. The veterinary's wife arrived--a thin, plain lady, with short hair and a peevish expression. With her was her little Sasha, a boy of ten, small for his age, blue-eyed, chubby, with dimples in his cheeks. And scarcely had the boy walked into the yard when he ran after the cat, and at once there was the sound of his gay, joyous laugh. 

 "Is that your puss, auntie?" he asked Olenka. "When she has little ones, do give us a kitten. Mamma is awfully afraid of mice." 

 Olenka talked to him, and gave him tea. Her heart warmed and there was a sweet ache in her bosom, as though the boy had been her own child. And when he sat at the table in the evening, going over his lessons, she looked at him with deep tenderness and pity as she murmured to herself: 

 "You pretty pet! . . . my precious! . . . Such a fair little thing, and so clever." 

 "'An island is a piece of land which is entirely surrounded by water,'" he read aloud. 

 "An island is a piece of land," she repeated, and this was the first opinion to which she gave utterance with positive conviction after so many years of silence and dearth of ideas. 

 Now she had opinions of her own, and at supper she talked to Sasha's parents, saying how difficult the lessons were at the high schools, but that yet the high school was better than a commercial one, since with a high-school education all careers were open to one, such as being a doctor or an engineer. 

 Sasha began going to the high school. His mother departed to Harkov to her sister's and did not return; his father used to go off every day to inspect cattle, and would often be away from home for three days together, and it seemed to Olenka as though Sasha was entirely abandoned, that he was not wanted at home, that he was being starved, and she carried him off to her lodge and gave him a little room there. 

 And for six months Sasha had lived in the lodge with her. Every morning Olenka came into his bedroom and found him fast asleep, sleeping noiselessly with his hand under his cheek. She was sorry to wake him. 

 "Sashenka," she would say mournfully, "get up, darling. It's time for school." He would get up, dress and say his prayers, and then sit down to breakfast, drink three glasses of tea, and eat two large cracknels and a half a buttered roll. All this time he was hardly awake and a little ill-humoured in consequence. 

 "You don't quite know your fable, Sashenka," Olenka would say, looking at him as though he were about to set off on a long journey. "What a lot of trouble I have with you! You must work and do your best, darling, and obey your teachers." 

 "Oh, do leave me alone!" Sasha would say. 

 Then he would go down the street to school, a little figure, wearing a big cap and carrying a satchel on his shoulder. Olenka would follow him noiselessly.

 "Sashenka!" she would call after him, and she would pop into his hand a date or a caramel. When he reached the street where the school was, he would feel ashamed of being followed by a tall, stout woman, he would turn round and say: 

 "You'd better go home, auntie. I can go the rest of the way alone." 

 She would stand still and look after him fixedly till he had disappeared at the school-gate. 

 Ah, how she loved him! Of her former attachments not one had been so deep; never had her soul surrendered to any feeling so spontaneously, so disinterestedly, and so joyously as now that her maternal instincts were aroused. For this little boy with the dimple in his cheek and the big school cap, she would have given her whole life, she would have given it with joy and tears of tenderness. Why? Who can tell why? 

 When she had seen the last of Sasha, she returned home, contented and serene, brimming over with love; her face, which had grown younger during the last six months, smiled and beamed; people meeting her looked at her with pleasure.

 "Good-morning, Olga Semyonovna, darling. How are you, darling?" 

 "The lessons at the high school are very difficult now," she would relate at the market. "It's too much; in the first class yesterday they gave him a fable to learn by heart, and a Latin translation and a problem. You know it's too much for a little chap." 

 And she would begin talking about the teachers, the lessons, and the school books, saying just what Sasha said. 

 At three o'clock they had dinner together: in the evening they learned their lessons together and cried. When she put him to bed, she would stay a long time making the Cross over him and murmuring a prayer; then she would go to bed and dream of that far-away misty future when Sasha would finish his studies and become a doctor or an engineer, would have a big house of his own with horses and a carriage, would get married and have children. . . . She would fall asleep still thinking of the same thing, and tears would run down her cheeks from her closed eyes, while the black cat lay purring beside her: "Mrr, mrr, mrr." 

 Suddenly there would come a loud knock at the gate. Olenka would wake up breathless with alarm, her heart throbbing. Half a minute later would come another knock. 

 "It must be a telegram from Harkov," she would think, beginning to tremble from head to foot. "Sasha's mother is sending for him from Harkov. . . . Oh, mercy on us!" 

 She was in despair. Her head, her hands, and her feet would turn chill, and she would feel that she was the most unhappy woman in the world. But another minute would pass, voices would be heard: it would turn out to be the veterinary surgeon coming home from the club. 

 "Well, thank God!" she would think. 

 And gradually the load in her heart would pass off, and she would feel at ease. She would go back to bed thinking of Sasha, who lay sound asleep in the next room, sometimes crying out in his sleep: 

 "I'll give it you! Get away! Shut up!" 

Saturday, November 22, 2025

COFFEE BEANS & BEINGS / OOPS, ANCIENT PHRYGIAN TOMB TURNED INTO COFFEE HOUSE—ILLEGALLY

 

CAFFEINE RAIDERS--Diners at the cafe, seated on a carpet laid out in the tomb.

By Janus Pell, PillartoPost.org Coffee Desk  

In Afyonkarahisar, Turkey, a high plateau city that has seen more empires than rainfall, a recent discovery has managed to bewilder archaeologists, amuse locals, and infuriate the Ministry of Culture all at once. 

A small café—popular, lively, and thoroughly modern—was found to be operating inside what turned out to be a 3,000-year-old Phrygian tomb.  

No one, least of all the tomb’s original occupant, could have imagined that eternal rest would one day be interrupted by the hiss of an espresso machine.  

The café, known to regulars as “The Hearth,” had long been admired for its cool stone interior and its uncanny acoustics. The owner attributed the space’s natural climate control to “old Anatolian engineering.” 

Customers assumed it was one more rustic touch in a region where antiquity is as common as limestone. It wasn’t until a visiting archaeologist spotted a carved Phrygian rosette behind a rack of flavored syrups that the deception began to unravel.  

Authorities arrived, gently moving aside patrons sipping macchiatos, and began dismantling drywall sections that had conveniently hidden key architectural clues. 

Under the plaster: authentic Phrygian funerary carvings, a sealed chamber behind a false wall, and the unmistakable geometry of a rock-cut burial vault. The café had been operating not in a historic building but inside a protected archaeological site. 

The Ministry was not amused. Restorers now face the delicate task of reversing the café’s “improvements,” which include electrical conduits drilled into 8th-century BCE stone and a ventilation shaft cut perilously close to a funerary relief. 

Charges are pending. 

The espresso machine has been unplugged.  

NOT SO SACRED GROUNDS.  Here is the 3,000-year-old Phrygian tomb in Afyonkarahiser that was illegally converted int a Turkish cafe-restaurant prompting legal action by local authorities.

Locals, however, have taken the news with characteristic Turkish deadpan. One patron shrugged to reporters: “The coffee was good. Maybe the Phrygians wouldn’t mind.” 

Another quipped that King Midas himself might approve, provided the tips were generous.  

Scholars see it differently. The tomb’s occupant—whose identity has yet to be determined—was laid to rest during the height of the Phrygian kingdom, a culture known for intricate craftsmanship and fiercely protected burial sites. That their sacred space had been converted, without permission, into a café-restaurant says less about ancient tradition and more about modern entrepreneurial nerve.  Excavation and preservation efforts are underway. 

The café tables have been removed. The tomb’s threshold has been sealed once more, this time by professionals.  

But in Afyonkarahisar, where every hillside holds a story, the episode has already entered local lore. 

Eternal rest, it seems, is never guaranteed—especially when your tomb has the perfect ambience for a tasty cappuccino. 

Wednesday, November 19, 2025

AMERICANA / THE GETTYSBURG ADDRESS


Delivered by President Abraham Lincoln, November 19, 1863 

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. 

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. 

It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate—we cannot consecrate—we cannot hallow—this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. 

The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. 

It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. 

It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us

— that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion

—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain

—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom

— and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth. 

Tuesday, November 18, 2025

SPACE CADETS / HOW CLOSE IS THE ALIEN COMET TO THE SAN DIEGO ZOO?

Clueless to the numerical gobblygook but we're assured it's a real photograph of 3i/ATLAS as it zips through our solar system.

Here’s the San Diego/North Park–specific snapshot for Mon Nov 3, 2025 (North Park News wire services): 

• Distance from Earth and the San Diego Zoo: ~2.25 AU or 208 million km. TheSkyLive 

• Where in the sky: In Virgo, very low in the ESE pre-dawn sky. Current coordinates are roughly RA 13h 19m, Dec −06° 09′. It’s just coming out of the Sun’s glare and sliding into the morning sky. TheSkyLive+1 

• When to look (San Diego): About ~2 hours before sunrise, i.e., roughly 4:30–5:30 AM local time this week. Expect it to sit low above the ESE horizon at only a few degrees altitude, improving slowly through November. Sky & Telescope+1 

• Brightness / gear: Around magnitude ~10–11 right now — you’ll need at least a small telescope (camera assists help a lot). TheSkyLive 

• Safety: On a hyperbolic, outbound path; no threat to Earth. Closest Earth distance will be ~1.8 AU in December. NASA Science 

Artist’s concept, not an actual capture of 3I/ATLAS.


Monday, November 17, 2025

MEDIA MONDAY / NEURODIVERGENT MINDS ARE FLOURISHING ON TV DETECTIVE SHOWS. WHY?

The British-Belgian series “Patience,” meanwhile, is the first detective show to feature an explicitly autistic character played by a neurodivergent actress, Ella Maisy Purvis

The rise of the autistic detective – why neurodivergent minds are at the heart of modern mysteries 

GUEST BLOG /By Soohyun Cho, Michigan State University VIA the Conversation.com 

There never seems to be a shortage of good crime shows on TV, and network television is teeming with detectives who think – and act – differently. 

This fall, new seasons of “Elsbeth,” “High Potential,” “Patience” and “Watson” have aired, and they all feature leads who share similar characteristics: They’re outsiders, they’re socially awkward, they can be emotionally distant, and their minds operate in unconventional ways. 

In fact, they all possess traits that align with what many people now associate with neurodivergence – what scholar Nick Walker defines as “a mind that functions in ways that diverge significantly from the dominant societal standards of ‘normal.’” 

As a scholar of popular culture, I’ve long been fascinated by this recurring character type – detectives who might, today, be diagnosed as having autism spectrum disorder. While researching my forthcoming book, “The Autistic Detective,” I’ve come to realize that most detectives in popular culture – yes, even Sherlock Holmes – exhibited neurodivergent characteristics, long before the term existed. 

The thin line between genius and madness 

In the late 19th century, when Sherlock Holmes was created, there was widespread scientific interest in the workings of the mind, particularly the thin line between genius and madness. 

British psychologist James Sully described “men of genius” as exhibiting “intellectual or moral peculiarities which are distinctly symptomatic of mental disease,” naming Edgar Allan Poe as an example of the “tragic fatefulness of geniuses.” Italian criminologist Cesare Lombroso, meanwhile, proposed that madness, genius and criminality were all closely intertwined. 

Such a fascination with exceptional minds – and the idea that madness and genius are two sides of the same coin – fed into the heart of detective fiction. And although later scholars have criticized the linking of neurodivergence to pathology, violence or genius, the trope remains common in popular culture, where it’s often used to signal the exceptional mind of a detective figure. 

Carrie Preston as Elsbeth
Now, however, many fans are able to connect these characteristics to specific diagnostic labels. According to CDC data from April 2025, autism diagnoses in U.S. children have risen sharply over the past two decades – from about 1 in 150 in 1998 to roughly 1 in 31 today. This reflects not only a broadened definition of the autism spectrum but also signals greater public awareness and acceptance of neurodivergence. 

That growing understanding has led to renewed interest in Holmes. From online fan forums to The New York Times, people have debated whether Holmes might be autistic, wondered whether another label would be more appropriate, or highlighted the futility of trying to diagnose a fictional character. 

Super intelligence and social dysfunction 

That said, it’s hard not to see some neurodivergent traits in Sherlock Holmes and other fictional detectives. 

Tunnel vision, pattern recognition and attention to detail are all traits that could be exhibited by autistic people. 

Holmes was fixated on minute details: One story highlighted how he authored a study on the ashes of 140 different varieties of pipe, cigar and cigarette tobacco. He had an unmatched talent for noticing overlooked details and piecing together disparate clues. And he was obsessed with forensic science. 

He could also come off as cold. As Holmes declared in “The Sign of the Four,” “Emotional qualities are antagonistic to clear reasoning.” 

In Edgar Allan Poe’s 1841 short story “The Murders in the Rue Morgue,” which is widely considered the first detective fiction story, the protagonist, C. Auguste Dupin, also hyperfocuses on small details, reasons through “pure logic” and is socially reclusive – all qualities displayed by Holmes. 

Even Dr. Watson, Holmes’ sidekick, noticed the resemblance. “You remind me of Edgar Allen Poe’s Dupin,” he tells Holmes in “A Study in Scarlet.” “I had no idea that such individuals did exist outside of stories.” 

When Sherlock Holmes creator Arthur Conan Doyle famously killed off the detective at Reichenbach Falls in his 1893 story “The Final Problem,” there was so much public outrage that the author was eventually forced to bring him back from the dead. 

These 19th-century Sherlock enthusiasts were predecessors to today’s media fandoms. Their level of devotion, unlike anything previously seen for a fictional character, was a testament to the power of Doyle’s formula: an extraordinary investigator with savantlike cognitive abilities who upholds logic over emotion, thrives in solitude and yet still depends on his companion – in Holmes’ case, Dr. Watson, who serves as an emotional counterbalance. 

In the 21st century, that formula has been revived in wildly popular TV shows such as “Bones,” “Criminal Minds” and “Sherlock.” 

In 2016, “Sherlock” co-creator Steven Moffat told the BBC, “Doyle began the idea that super-intelligence comes at the price of some kind of social dysfunction, something that we’ve grasped as a narrative possibility ever since.” 

In other words, the more eccentric – or socially dysfunctional – a detective is, the more ingenious the hero seems. 

A new era for the detective 

Detective fiction might have started as a way to explore the deviant, non-normative minds of detectives and the criminals they pursued. But it has since become a space for neurodivergent self-representation. 

Today, scholars, fans, reviewers and scientists openly discuss diagnostic labels for fictional characters. This surge in interest coincides with a rise in research on portrayals of autism in the media and a growing number of autistic voices examining how those portrayals shape public understanding. 

Disability scholars have long warned of disabled characters being used as mere plot devices and have criticized the lack of diversity in representations of detectives who appear to be autistic on screen. 

Yet many of the new shows push back against some of the stereotypes of autistic people as cold, lonely and incapable of affection. Instead, they have friends. They have romantic partners. They’re empathetic. 

Two time Academy Award nominee Cynthia Erivo as Holly Gibney.

The series “Elsbeth” and “High Potential” center on quirky, intelligent female investigative leads who appear to be on the autism spectrum. In HBO’s 2020 miniseries “The Outsider,” detective Holly Gibney appears as one of the first Black, autistic female detectives on television. 

While most of these characters aren’t explicitly identified as autistic in their shows, “Extraordinary Attorney Woo” features a female attorney whose diagnosis is openly discussed by the show’s characters. 

 The British-Belgian series “Patience,” meanwhile, is the first detective show to feature an explicitly autistic character played by a neurodivergent actress, Ella Maisy Purvis. “It was really important to me that she wasn’t this kind of robotic, asexual drone,” Purvis told the Big Issue in 2025. 

“Patience is highly empathetic. She cares so much about her job and the people around her. It’s just expressed in a different way.” These varied portrayals coincide with the rise of online fan communities where neurodivergent fans share what these stories mean to them. 

If the archetypal detective once tried to “make sense” of neurodivergent minds, today’s neurodivergent fans and creators are now having a hand in shaping them. Perhaps most importantly, they no longer have to wonder whether they’re being represented on screen. 

Sunday, November 16, 2025

AMERICANA / LOST OUR CENTS — NOW WHAT?

Lincoln Cent [1909 to 2025].

The U.S. penny is dead. But the economic, cultural, and market fallout is only beginning. 

The United States Mint has pressed its final penny. No ceremony. No farewell tour. Just a quiet shutdown of the dies that produced the country’s most ubiquitous coin for more than two centuries. 

The decision ends a monetary era, but it also creates a rare moment of national disruption — part economic inconvenience, part cultural jolt, part market opportunity. The penny may have been economically irrational, but ending it introduces a new set of problems that no spreadsheet fully accounts for. 

This is the dilemma facing America today. 

The Government Solved a Cost Problem and Exposed a Behavioral One 

For years, the penny cost more to manufacture than its face value. Lawmakers finally acted, eliminating a federal money-loser. 

But now comes the friction. 

Billions of pennies remain in circulation, yet no new ones will replace them. Businesses must implement rounding policies. States must decide whether to regulate consistency. Consumers — especially cash-dependent Americans — must recalibrate their daily transactions in real time. 

The government saved money. 

But it also forced a psychological rewrite of how Americans think about value, precision, and fairness at the cash register. 

The Market Shock: A 230-Year Coin Series Is Frozen Overnight 

Numismatics is driven by a force Wall Street understands well: finite supply meets sudden finality. The moment the last penny left the press, the entire Lincoln series — 1909 through 2025 — became a fixed asset class. This is no longer history in motion. This is history locked. And that immediately rewires the market: 

• Key dates spike. 1909-S VDB, 1914-D, 1922 “No D,” 1955 double die — all are moving upward. 

• High-grade common cents are revalued. MS-67 and MS-68 examples once ignored now command real inspection. 

• The 2025 penny becomes an instant modern flagship. Not rare, but historically final — and that creates competition. 

• Copper hoarding intensifies. Pre-1982 cents become a commodity play, not a curiosity. In securities terms, the penny just shifted from “active issuance” to “closed fund” — and investors are repositioning. 

Biggest Winner: Nostalgia. 

Biggest Loser: Liquidity. 

Americans react emotionally to small symbols. They are already hoarding pennies — not for profit, but for sentiment. This removes millions of cents from circulation every week, artificially tightening supply and accelerating the transition to a de facto penny-free economy faster than regulators anticipated. 

This hoarding behavior also generates two systemic issues: 

1. Liquidity distortion — Pennies still count as legal tender, but they are disappearing into coffee cans, jars, glove compartments, and desk drawers faster than they can circulate. 

2. Uneven transition costs — Lower-income Americans, who rely more heavily on cash, bear the brunt of rounding practices before retailers and states harmonize standards. In other words: The penny’s economic inefficiency is gone — but its logistical inefficiency remains. 

Numismatics Must Now Replace Its Gateway Drug 

For over a century, the Lincoln cent has been the entry point for American coin collecting — affordable, accessible, democratic. 

Its disappearance raises a real question for the industry: What replaces the coin that introduced four generations to the hobby? Quarters? Too complicated. Nickels? Too few key dates. Dollars? Too expensive. Digital money? No emotional connection. 

The industry must now build a new on-ramp for young collectors. Losing the penny is not just a minting event — it is a structural shift in the culture of American numismatics. 

The Broader Economic Symbolism 

Ultimately, killing the penny is a policy decision rooted in efficiency. But it also broadcasts a deeper message: America is willing to discard legacy symbols when the math no longer supports them. That is both modern and melancholy. A sign of fiscal responsibility — and a sign of what we lose when cost curves dictate cultural artifacts. 

Future historians will view November 2025 as the moment the U.S. finally aligned its smallest unit of currency with economic reality. 

But sociologists will read it differently: as the moment America learned that even the tiniest symbol carries weight. The penny was never worth much. Now that it’s gone, we’re discovering just how valuable it actually was. 

Saturday, November 15, 2025

AMERICANA / THE GUARDRAILS THAT REMAIN


OPINION: PillartoPost.org Daily Internet Magazine.


 When the Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that a president has broad immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts, many Americans felt a deep shock. The decision broke with every historical understanding of the presidency. It expanded presidential power in a way the Founders never intended. For many, it felt like a pillar of democracy had cracked.

 But a republic does not rest on one pillar. It rests on many. Even when one weakens, others still stand. American democracy still includes Congress, the states, the lower courts, and the people themselves. Power has shifted, but it has not vanished. Understanding these remaining safeguards is the key to preventing this decision from becoming a permanent shield for presidential abuse. 

 Congress still has the power to make laws that define limits on presidential behavior. The Court did not eliminate Congress’s authority to strengthen protections around the Justice Department, to clarify what actions count as abuses of office, or to demand transparency. Will Congress act? That is a political question. But the power remains. 

 States also still hold authority. The ruling affects only federal prosecution for federal acts. It does not take away the power of states to investigate crimes that harm their residents. A president may be immune in Washington, but not necessarily in New York, Georgia, Arizona, or California. The Founders built this dual system to prevent power from concentrating too tightly in one place. That safeguard still works. 

 Lower federal courts still decide what counts as an official act. The Supreme Court gave broad principles, but it did not give detailed rules. Every future case will begin with a judge deciding whether a president was acting within the true scope of the job or simply using the office to shield wrongdoing. Over time, courts can narrow the meaning of “official act,” limiting the reach of immunity. 

 Elections remain the final check. No court can shield a president from political consequences. Voters can remove a leader who tries to use immunity as a license for misconduct. The ballot box is older than the Court itself, and it remains the most powerful democratic tool. 

 Civil society also still matters. Journalists, teachers, clergy, veterans, lawyers, students, and everyday citizens shape public values. They influence what the country tolerates and what it refuses to accept. When legal guardrails weaken, cultural and civic guardrails often strengthen in response. Democracy persists because people refuse to give up on it. 

 The Court’s ruling is serious and troubling. It opens the door to potential abuses. But it is not the end of the American system. It is a challenge to it. Democracies do not fall because a ruling goes wrong. They fall when citizens stop pushing back. Americans have never been good at staying quiet. Some guardrails are still there. They now depend on us.

Friday, November 14, 2025

FILM / JAMES DEAN IN TIMES SQUARE, 1954


In early 1954, James Dean walked through a cold, rainy Times Square with his coat collar raised, cigarette in place and hands buried in his pockets. Photographer Dennis Stock, then with Magnum Photos, followed him through the storm for what would become one of the most enduring portraits of American youth culture. 

Stock met Dean shortly before the actor’s breakout and recognized in him a quality that went beyond Hollywood ambition — a raw mix of vulnerability, defiance and untested fame. 

He proposed a Life magazine photo essay that would show Dean not as a studio creation but as a young man in transition, living between anonymity and legend. Stock believed weather revealed truth; in the rain and muted neon of Manhattan, Dean appeared unguarded and inward, walking without performance. 

The city, usually loud and overwhelming, fades behind him into reflective puddles and blurred signs, giving the frame a sense of solitude rather than spectacle. Dean’s career would ignite shortly after, with East of Eden and Rebel Without a Cause defining him as the face of post-war restlessness. 

He died in a car crash 1955 at age 24, but this photograph, taken before celebrity hardened around him, remains one of the clearest records of who he was at the edge of becoming — a quiet figure moving through a restless city, unaware the world was already watching. 

Thursday, November 13, 2025

THE FOODIST / THE TRUE ORIGIN OF FISH & CHIPS

These fish & chips were prepared and served in Paris

Long before gastropubs plated it with truffle aioli and Himalayan salt, before seaside kiosks wrapped it in yesterday’s headlines, there was simply the sizzle. A fillet of humble white fish, dipped in batter and kissed by hot oil, meeting a pile of golden potato batons—crisped at the edges, soft as a Sunday confession inside. 

Fish and chips, as elemental as saltwater and good fortune, seems as though it has always existed. Yet this eminently British treasure is a tapestry woven from wandering cultures, borrowed techniques, and—like all great culinary romances—timing.  

The story begins not along some English pier, but in the sun-lit kitchens of Sephardic Jews fleeing Portugal and Spain in the 16th and 17th centuries. They brought with them pescado frito—fish dredged in flour and fried in olive oil, traditionally prepared on Fridays to be eaten cold on the next day on the Jewish Sabbath. 

When these families settled in London’s East End, their recipe flexed to its new climate and pantry. Olive oil became cheaper fats, Mediterranean fish were swapped for cod and haddock pulled from chilly northern waters, and a Londoner’s palate—never shy of comfort—took note.  

Meanwhile, across the Channel, another revolution simmered in bubbling fat. In Belgium and France, cooks were turning potatoes—once eyed with suspicion in Britain as livestock feed—into crisp, fried strips. 

Legend tells of a Belgian winter so severe the river froze solid, leaving villagers without fish; in their craving they sliced potatoes into the shape of minnows and fried them instead. Whether myth or memory, by the mid-19th century Britain, too, had fallen for fried potatoes, affectionately naming them “chips.”  

Then came the alchemy. London claims the honor with the East End’s Joseph Malin, a Jewish entrepreneur who, sometime around 1860, married fried fish to chips in a tiny shop in Bow. 

Up north, Lancashire counters with John Lees of Mossley, who served the same golden duet from a wooden stall around 1863. Food historians debate, civic pride swells—and the rest of us happily concede that genius can spark twice.  

Clegg’s Fish & Chip Shop, circa 1890s, Northern England An early English chippy—Clegg’s Fish & Chip Restaurant—serves as both workplace and family stage. Starched aprons, proud owners, and wide-eyed children greet the camera in a scene from the dawn of Britain’s most democratic meal. Fresh tripe, trotters, and hand-cut potatoes in the window tell the story of a hearty industrial-era diet, before neon signs and takeaway counters became the norm.

Industrialization acted as midwife. Trains sped fresh fish from coastal ports to inland towns. Coal ranges allowed frying at scale. And suddenly Britain, on-the-move and factory-bound, found solace in a meal that was quick, substantial, and democratic. 

Fish and chips were sustenance for dockworkers, fuel for mill girls, a Friday night treat for families in smoky brick terraces. Even Parliament understood its power: during both world wars, rationing spared the dish. A nation under strain needed comfort. It needed familiarity. It needed vinegar soaked into crisp batter and the steam rising when you tore open the paper.  

Sir Winston Churchill, with typical economy of wit, called fish and chips “the good companions.” He might as well have called them indispensable.  

Today, the dish has ascended and circled back. Michelin-starred chefs reinterpret it with line-caught fish, artisanal batter, and triple-cooked potatoes, presenting what working-class ingenuity wrought with white-gloved reverence. At the same time, true devotees swear allegiance to the humble chippy: fluorescent lights, malt vinegar in cloudy bottles, fingers still warm from the fryer’s hiss. Both are correct. This is a dish that belongs everywhere, to everyone.  

Fish and chips is not a recipe; it is a journey. A migration of taste, a marriage of necessity and delight, a testament to the delicious truth that the world’s most beloved foods rarely begin in palaces but in neighborhoods where people work hard and eat gratefully. It is the immigrant’s resilience, the industrialist’s efficiency, and the islander’s love of the sea—all wrapped in paper and passed across a counter.  

And so you bite in. The crackle, the softness, the vinegar’s bright sting, the whisper of the ocean beneath it all. History dissolves into hunger. Tradition becomes pleasure. And you know, in that instant, that this most British of meals is also universal—proof that simple things, done with care, endure. 

Mick’s Fish Bar, 1960s London. A group of young Londoners gather outside Mick’s Fish Bar in the swinging-sixties capital, where a late-night paper-wrapped portion of fried cod and chips was the unofficial fuel of British youth. Leather jackets, slick haircuts, and working-class swagger marked a generation finding its voice between post-war austerity and the new cultural beat of modern Britain.

***

Jumbo sized order of fish & chips served at Studio Diner in San Diego CA.




Wednesday, November 12, 2025

RETRO FILES / DAY IN THE LIFE OF KING TUT; 5000 YEARS AGO


By Janus Pell, PillartoPost.org history editor
--Morning in Thebes rose in layers, like a long-held breath released over the Nile. First the river light — pale, watery gold — shimmering across the moored boats and clustered papyrus beds. Then the temple light — slabs of brilliance sliding down the pylons of Karnak, waking the colossal gods who slept in the stone. And finally the human light — the glow of ovens, braziers, clean-washed faces, and a thousand small chores spilling into the streets.  

This was Tutankhamun’s Thebes: a city that never merely awakened but unfurled, petal by petal, along the west and east banks. Thebes was a city of unreasoning splendor, a hive of stone and sun, where every doorway seemed to open into another century. Thebes lived and breathed three thousand years before another child took the throne — the Christ Child — yet its pulse still thrummed with a confidence that believed its own gods would outlast time itself.  

On the East Bank, life beat loudest. The avenues filled with the cry of market sellers hawking fish freshly pulled from the river, heaps of figs, spools of linen dyed in river-indigo. Carts creaked under loads of pottery. Donkeys swayed under baskets of grain, their hooves clattering on limestone causeways. Aromas braided together — cumin, river mud, warm bread, incense drifting from temple courtyards.  

Above it all loomed the vast silhouette of Karnak, its pillars like a stone forest the gods themselves had planted. Every morning priests in spotless linen crossed its shadowed halls carrying censers of resin and myrrh, whispering hymns that clung to the air like spider silk. The entire quarter thrummed with devotion, bureaucracy, trade — all the moving parts of a kingdom whose heart beat here.  

In the palace district near the river, where Tutankhamun lived, the city changed character. The streets widened, shaded by gardens of sycamores, tamarisks, and imported myrtle that softened the heat. Water channels glimmered like liquid glass. Servants carried sealed letters, jars of unguent, trays of cooling beer. Young nobles on chariots practiced steering between blue-painted posts. Eunuchs hurried between doorways with the briskness of men who knew every corridor by memory.  

From the palace balconies, the boy-king would have smelled the wet Nile wind carrying life upstream and history downstream — the scent of a river older than every dynasty.  

Across the water lay the West Bank, the city’s dream-side. Here were the tombs — the Valley of the Kings — and the mortuary temples where a person measured time not by the hour but by eternity. During Tut’s youth, artisans at Deir el-Medina chipped and burned and smoothed walls destined for kings who would lie sealed under the mountain. 

Their little village bustled in its own way — children chasing goats, wives baking emmer loaves in clay ovens, scribes tallying grain.  

But it was the East Bank, with its daily roar, that shaped Tutankhamun.  

The clang of metalworkers at the forges.  

The shouted laughter of boatmen unloading papyrus bundles.  

The thrum of the great festival processions, when barges of the gods glided down the Nile and the whole city surged like a single, enormous heartbeat. 

Then, all of Thebes heard the young Tut rolling through the working district in his chariot; two white imperial steeds snorting hooves pounding on the mud roadway.  The young King urged his chargers for more speed.  Snap of a whip.  Laugher.  He pulled away from his lieutenants. He'd find the river and chase along the shore.  Such a glorious day to be King of Egypt.

SCENES FROM EGYPT'S NEW TUT MUSEUM 

Chariots from the collection of King Tutankhamun

The throne of Egyptian king Tutankhamun on display

A child (right) looks at the golden coffin of ancient Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun during first day for visitors after the official opening of the Grand Egyptian Museum, near the Giza pyramid complex in Giza, Egypt.


Tuesday, November 11, 2025

AMERICANA / WHERE IS THE NEXT JOE WELCH WHEN WE NEED ONE MOST

FIGHTING JOE'SU.S. Army chief counsel Joseph Welch (left) and Sen. Joe McCarthy (right) say it with gestures during the celebrated Army-McCarthy hearings in Washington, D.C., in June 1954. During the hearings, Welch famously asked McCarthy, “Have you no sense of decency, sir?”
Photo courtesy of the Associated Press

OPINION BY PILLARTOPOST.ORG 

The line still echoes across seven decades of American political life: “Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?” With those words in 1954, Joseph N. Welch punctured the fever of McCarthyism and reminded a shaken nation that truth has guardians, and democracy has its immune system.   

Welch was not an elected official. He was not an activist. He was a lawyer with a steady voice and a moral spine. What made his rebuke historic was not its volume but its clarity. He spoke plainly, without hedging, at a moment when silence would have been easier and far safer. 

In doing so, he did what institutions could not manage and what too many public figures refused to attempt—he drew a line.   

The question for our age is simple and uncomfortable: Where is the next Joe Welch when we need one? Not a partisan warrior, not a social-media hero, but a figure willing to halt the descent into noise, cruelty, and disinformation with one unambiguous demand for decency.   

Every era produces its demagogues. 

They arrive with familiar tools—fear, exaggeration, scapegoating, and the steady erosion of shared facts. What is less guaranteed is the arrival of someone willing to confront them in real time, with both precision and moral authority. Someone who sees that corrosive behavior does not correct itself; it accelerates until checked.   


Welch did not topple McCarthy alone. But he triggered the moment when the country regained its balance, when the gallery fell silent, and when Americans realized the spell had broken. It was a reminder that character can alter the national temperature, and that a single honest sentence, delivered without theatrics, can pierce an entire movement built on intimidation.   

Today we wait for a voice like that—calm, relentless, unimpressed by bluster, anchored in civic duty. Not someone seeking fame but someone protecting the atmosphere in which a democracy can breathe.   

The next Joe Welch may be sitting in a courtroom, a classroom, a newsroom, a barracks, or a city hall. The role is not tied to title or rank. It is tied to conscience.   

The nation will know that person the moment they speak. 

Sunday, November 9, 2025

SUNDAY REVIEW / HONEYMOON AT SEA, PART 2


SAILING THE CALI COAST BETWEEN GIANTS GAMES

By Jennifer Silva Redmond, pictured above.

When Russel and I got married, there weren’t many big things we didn’t know about each other. We’d known each other for 14 years before we got hitched, after all, and though we’d only dated for a year during that time, we had all the basics down—we shared a philosophy of life that pretty much boiled down to “seize the day,” we were liberal democrats, we grew up in California (though Russel was born in Iowa, his family moved to Oceanside when he was 5) and we both loved the ocean. 

We also shared a fondness for live theater, movie musicals, big dogs, and seventies rock music. What we did not have in common was sports. Russel liked baseball and I loved baseball. And I especially loved the San Francisco Giants, even though I never lived in San Francisco, and my hometown was San Diego. That’s a long story which I won’t go into, but suffice to say that I was a pretty rabid Giants fan. 

Russel was happy to indulge my passion but he was a bit worried when I came running out to the dock shouting when I couldn’t get game 2 of the 1989 World Series to come in on his little tv on the boat. 

I was pissed off, to hear him tell it, and it took finding out there’d been a devastating earthquake to shut me up. 

In 2002, Russel started to get pretty excited when the Giants won the Pennant and went to lose the World Series. By the time 2010 rolled around, he was almost as big a fan as I was and we got even more crazy when the Giants did it again in 2012. 

That fall was a magical one, with the Giants winning the World Series and Barack Obama winning a second term. 

Then, in 2014, my beloved husband came up with an idea to celebrate our 25th anniversary—why not take the boat up to San Francisco, stay a few weeks, and see the Giants in person at their ballpark? I was over the moon, of course, and we proceeded to put his plan into action. 

We sailed north up the coast, stopping at Santa Cruz Island and Santa Barbara and then jumped up to Morro Bay for our actual anniversary in late May. We planned to cruise on up to SF and catch some games in June or July, before heading south in early August. But Monterey was as far as we got by sailboat. 

Stillwater Cove daytime
It happened like this: we left the gorgeous, protected anchorage at San Simeon in the late afternoon, as we often do when making a long passage. There’s nowhere for a sailboat to safely stop in the miles north of San Simeon, until you reach Stillwater Cove, the lovely bay that the Pebble Beach golf course and resort wraps around so scenically. 

The 92 miles would take us about 18 hours, but we’d take turns being on watch, so the other could sleep. We waved goodbye to Hearst Castle as the afternoon sun warmed the rolling golden hills of San Simeon, a place we’d come to love on previous visits. 

The Pacific swell was only moderate, coming as always from the northwest along the coast, meaning right on our nose, and we settled in for a long spell of motoring. 

At seven o’clock, our dinner eaten, I volunteered for the first watch, knowing there was a Giants game coming on that I could tune in to on Sirius Radio—listening to that would keep me awake while looking around and staying alert to any potential problems. 

 Russel went below and tried to rest, but two hours later, off Big Sur, he popped up saying he was “too interested to sleep.” We both watched awhile as the boat crept along the towering rock cliffs, then we took turns going below and lying in the v-berth, but sleep eluded us both. I took my turns in the warm bed but couldn’t shut down my mind, and Russel had the same problem; we each slept an hour or two out of the 14 we’d allowed for sleep and watches. 

The motoring went better than the sleeping and we got to Stillwater Cove before it was light, not a good time to come into a shallow, rocky, kelp-filled cove that we’d never entered before. We decided to press on to Monterey, knowing we could anchor off the marina and not have to deal with docking in our sleep-deprived state. 

 I have always been able to “maintain” pretty well on little or no sleep, thanks to many years of working long shifts in restaurants and bars, followed by doing acting rehearsals, classes, or performances. But I was pretty tired by the time we rounded the big peninsula that wraps around the big bay of Monterey to the west and south. 

Russel was lying quietly below and, hoping he was sleeping, I kept steering through the quirky but beautiful approach to the harbor. The houses along those few miles are some of the most beautiful in the world, and their waterfront settings are world-class too. 

Monterey Bay
When Russel came up, he was happy to see we’d arrived, but we were both unhappy to see that the swell was also wrapping around and heading into the bay, making the anchorage as full of swells as the open ocean. Admitting defeat, beaten by the elements, we called the marina office and they said they had a slip for us, so we powered to the dock, exhausted and with the stress working on our final nerves. 

Once we’d pulled into the slip and safely tied up, I walked up to the office to check us in and pay for the slip, and Russel got the boat straightened up—passages always cause things you thought were fastened to come loose and by the end of 18 hours, there were plenty of things strewn about or hastily stuck in odd places. 

The rest of the day was spent in the v-berth where, even though I still couldn’t fall asleep, I was more than content to read and relax in the still and quiet boat while Russel napped. 

The next day we looked at the charts for the next leg of our passage up to San Francisco and decided that we’d “prefer not to.” Better to stay put in Monterey and go up by car. We rented a slip in Monterey’s marina for a month, enjoying daily walks filled with sightseeing around the historic city. In late June, almost a month after my birthday, we rented a car in Monterey and drove up to SF for a couple of days, planning to eat some great seafood, see some baseball, and do a little city-by-the-bay tourism. 

The cioppino at the renowned Tadich Grill was delicious—it always is—and we enjoyed walking around the city as we always do, but a few little things got in the way of us having our dream vacation. I’d chosen our hotel based purely on the fact that it wasn’t too expensive and was right on the train line to AT&T Park (we’d decided that public transport was the smart way to get to the ballpark, which is still true). 

That night we took the train over to the ballpark, taking in the sights at the glittering Embarcadero. Unfortunately, the Giants got soundly beat by our hometown Padres and we got back to the hotel late and bummed out. We were asleep at midnight when the loud partying started next door, and the noise kept us tossing and turning for hours. 

At dawn I got up to take a morning walk and found a nearby cafe that served excellent coffee and buttermilk donuts. Russel was able to sleep in once the party animals retired at four, so he wasn’t feeling too bad. The fresh donuts and strong coffee (and a full refund from Hotels.com) made us both feel much better. 

That day we drove over to Sausalito, the charming village just over the Golden Gate from SF. We’d been advised to try The Spinnaker for lunch, which lived up to its billing on waterfront views as well as great food, plus the Bloody Marys were spicy and strong. 

Full as a tick, I wandered back from the ladies room past a bar where the Wednesday afternoon Giants game was on. I stopped to watch a moment, only to discover that Tim Lincecum was pitching a no-hitter against the Padres. I called Russel over and we spent the after-lunch hour watching baseball history be made, just a few miles away. I tried to take it well, but of course I was kicking myself. Why hadn’t I chosen the day game? 

Luckily, it was a gorgeous afternoon to enjoy Sausalito, so we wandered the streets and happily window shopped before heading home, worn out from the ups and downs of our long-awaited Giants visit to the big city. 

Notes: 
An earlier version of this essay was originally published in Womancake Magazine in 2024; it is reprinted here with the permission of that publication. 

Enjoy Womancake Magazine at: https://www.womancake.com/ 

Follow Jennifer’s Substack at https://honeymoonatsea.substack.com/ 

"Honeymoon at Sea: How I Found Myself Living on a Small Boat" can be purchased online or please feel free to order it at your favorite bookstore.

                                                                ***

Author just missed this game. Candlestick Park, San Francisco after Earthquake World Series Game 3 October 17, 1989 vs. Oakland Athletics.