Total Pageviews

Monday, June 8, 2026

LOCAL / WHAT'S UP AT CITY HALL THIS WEEK

San Diego City Council Chambers, 202 C Street. Downtown.

Community Coalition Bulletin 

 The San Diego Community Coalition publishes this email bulletin to keep our members informed about important Council and Planning Commission hearings and other city public meetings. 

 Monday, June 8: City Council, 10 a.m. 

 Agenda: https://sandiego.hylandcloud.com/211agendaonlinecouncil/Meetings/ViewMeeting?id=7008&doctype=1&site=council 

 Items 600, 601, 602, 639, 643, 644: Proclamations 

Why it matters: We must ask again for an explanation of how and why honorees are chosen. The last three were added to a very packed agenda in the last few days. The last two (including a Scripps Health administrator who is a Rotary Club officer) have no supporting documents. Everyone agrees that Council meetings run too long. These performative agenda items add extra time but little civic substance. 

 Item 613: 2026 Update to the San Diego Municipal Code (Land Development Code) 

 Why it matters: One of the amendments “would increase … the City Council appeal fee [on project and environmental appeals] from $1,000 to $2,380, based on the unreimbursed staff time required to process and hear the appeals.” This would shut out public input by more than doubling public access fees to get a hearing before the City Council. The San Diego Democratic Party’s Environmental Club has appealed the proposal. And community planning groups, which are formally charged with conveying community input, should not be charged for appeals. 

 Monday, June 8: City Council, 2 p.m. 

 Agenda: https://sandiego.hylandcloud.com/211agendaonlinecouncil/Meetings/ViewMeeting?id=7008&doctype=1&site=council 

 Item 640: Reduction of Solid Waste Management Fee in Fiscal Years 2028 and 2029 

Item 641: Repeal Balboa Park Paid Parking User Fee 

Why it matters: These two items constitute a settlement of a lawsuit against the City’s bait-and-switch trash fees. The City agreed to scale back the trash fees. As an unexpected bonus, it will restore free parking in Balboa Park starting on or before January 1, 2027. 

Background: https://obrag.org/2026/05/city-surrenders-on-trash-fees-and-paid-balboa-park-parking/ 

Tuesday, June 9: City Council, 1 p.m. 

 Agenda: https://sandiego.hylandcloud.com/211agendaonlinecouncil/Meetings/ViewMeeting?id=7031&doctype=1&site=council 

 Item 704: Approval of the City’s 2027 Budget 

 Why it matters: One of the most contentious budget cycles in recent memory is expected to wrap up with the announcement of the restoration of arts funding including $6 million from the City treasury and $3 million from the Prebys Foundation. 

 Background: https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2026/06/05/san-diego-restores-10m-in-arts-funding-reversing-proposed-budget-cuts-heres-how/ 

 Tuesday, June 9: San Diego Housing Authority, 2:00 p.m. 

 Agenda: https://sdhc.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/06092026-Housing-Authority-Regular-Meeting-Agenda.pdf 

 From Robert Campbell in Encanto: “The 2025 settlement in the Patrice Baker vs City of San Diego lawsuit strictly limits the concentration of new affordable housing projects in the city's low-resource areas. Yet, the Housing Commission (SDHC) continues [to] directly undermine the state Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) law and the explicit terms of the Baker settlement. In the SDHC presentation for Item #705 on Tuesday's agenda, the two projects they highlight on page 8 of their report are both located in census tracts that score 1 of 9 points for opportunity, making them solidly low-resource. No other affordable housing is highlighted in the report, and [there is] no mention of AFFH or resource opportunity.” 

 Tuesday, June 9: “Homes for All of Us” Forum

Mayor Todd Gloria’s Planning Department is hosting a June 9 “community input” meeting on his “Homes for All of Us” initiative on Tuesday, June 9, at 5:30 p.m. at the Malcolm X Library at 5148 Market Street in Valencia Park. Unfortunately, the forum is already full, and no more reservations will be accepted. The Ocean Beach Rag newspaper will send a reporter to cover the event and file a story.  Library Phone: 619-527-3405

Background: https://obrag.org/2026/06/planning-dept-holding-community-input-on-mayor-glorias-homes-for-all-of-us-be-there-to-ask-questions-tues-june-9th/ 

 Thursday, June 11: Land Use and Housing Committee, 1 p.m. 

Agenda: https://sandiego.hylandcloud.com/211agendaonlinecomm/Meetings/ViewMeeting?id=7045&doctype=1&site=comm 

 Item 3: Resolution Supporting Assembly Bills 1903, 1406, and 1070 Aimed at Expanding Homeownership 

 Why it matters: These three bills are aimed at boosting condominium production by changing how construction defect claims are handled (1903), dismantling consumer protections for condo buyers (1406), and relaxing building code standards on multifamily housing projects (1070). 

 In-person: Council and Housing Authority, 202 C St., 

To participate via Zoom and submit written comments, click on the meeting agenda and look for the links. 

--Forwarded to the media by San Diego citizen Kate Callen.

MONDAY MEDIA / STANDING STRONG AGAINST THE DELUGE


T
he New York Times Magazine
occupies a strange and increasingly valuable place in American media culture. In an era when most general-interest magazines have either collapsed, narrowed into niche verticals, or become celebrity-and-lifestyle catalogs masquerading as journalism, it remains one of the few surviving institutions still attempting the old grand ambition: to explain America to itself every week. 

That alone makes it noteworthy. 

The great general magazines of the twentieth century once formed a kind of national conversation. Titles like Life, Look, Collier’s, The Saturday Evening Post, and later the glory-era versions of Esquire, Harper’s, and The Atlantic assumed there existed a broad literate middle class willing to spend time reading long-form journalism, essays, criticism, fiction, photography, travel writing, and cultural argument in one package. The magazine was not merely information. It was a weekly intellectual parlor. 

Most of that world is gone. 

Television first wounded the format. Cable fragmented it. The internet atomized it. Social media then completed the demolition by training readers to consume headlines emotionally rather than absorb arguments patiently. What survived tended to be either luxury branding vehicles or highly specialized journals aimed at tightly defined tribes. 

Against that backdrop, the continued existence of the Times Magazine feels almost improbable. 

Part of its resilience comes from institutional gravity. Attached to The New York Times, it benefits from a reporting infrastructure and subscriber base few standalone magazines could ever duplicate today. But survival alone does not explain its influence. What distinguishes the magazine is its continuing willingness to spend money and pages on ambitious narrative journalism in a media climate that increasingly rewards speed over depth. 

Its strengths are still formidable. 

The photography and design often remain world-class, carrying forward the tradition that magazines should be visual experiences rather than mere text delivery systems. The feature writing can still produce the occasional national conversation piece. Its profiles frequently shape elite opinion because they are read not only by ordinary subscribers but by editors, producers, publishers, academics, political staffers, and executives. In practical terms, a major feature in the magazine still functions as a cultural coronation. 

It also understands something many digital publications have forgotten: pacing matters. A well-constructed magazine issue has rhythm. Politics gives way to culture, which yields to memoir, criticism, food, architecture, ethics, fashion, or science. That variation creates serendipity. Readers encounter subjects they did not know they cared about. Algorithms rarely permit such accidents anymore. 

Yet the magazine also reflects the limitations of contemporary elite publishing. 

At times it can feel ideologically overmanaged, as though every article must pass through an invisible layer of institutional self-consciousness. Older magazines often projected confidence—even arrogance—but they were less anxious about signaling moral positioning. Today’s version sometimes reads as though editors anticipate backlash before publication and subtly pre-defend themselves inside the prose. 

There is also the broader problem facing all prestige magazines: the disappearance of shared national culture. In the 1960s or 1970s, a major magazine article might become common conversational currency across classes and regions. Today even acclaimed features often circulate mainly among educated urban readers already inclined toward the publication’s worldview. Influence survives, but consensus does not. 

Still, compared with the skeletal state of much modern magazine publishing, the Times Magazine remains remarkably alive. 

Many magazines today are essentially catalogs wrapped around advertisements. Others are SEO farms with elegant typography. Some exist primarily to produce social-media excerpts rather than complete reading experiences. By contrast, the Times Magazine still occasionally produces pieces with enough reporting, literary texture, and editorial ambition to justify sitting in a chair for an uninterrupted hour—a surprisingly radical act in 2026. 

Its continued importance may ultimately lie less in ideology or prestige than in memory. It preserves the idea that long-form general-interest journalism still matters. That there remains value in writers roaming widely across politics, science, morality, art, crime, technology, and ordinary life without reducing everything to listicles, outrage, or identity branding. 

Whether that tradition survives another generation is uncertain. 

But in a shrinking world of general magazines, the Times Magazine remains one of the last big rooms left open. 

###

Compiled by the staff of PillartoPost.org, a daily online magazine style blog. Being a microcosm of general interest magazines, we salute the epitome of that remarkable genre: The New York Times Magazine. 

***

[Sponsored:]



Sunday, June 7, 2026

ALTERNATIVE HISTORY / THE PINKERTON SURPRISE, 1865 / FICTION

NOTE: First in a Series of Alternative Events, Episode One.

By Thomas Shess, Author of Cantina Psalms and Tough Love.

John Wilkes Booth was not stopped by a soldier’s bullet. 

He was not stopped by Providence in thunder, nor by a warning whispered into Mrs. Lincoln's ear, nor by some sudden tightening of security in the corridor behind the President's box. 

He was delayed by vanity. That was all. 

A young woman asked for his autograph. 

She was one of the understudies at Ford's Theatre, not yet famous, perhaps never to be famous, though she possessed the mien confidence of a young woman who had already been noticed often enough to know that notice was a form of currency. Her name was Roberta Woodward and on the night the President came to see the play Our American Cousin, she stood backstage in a blue dress with a ribbon at her throat and a folded playbill in her hand. 

She saw Booth before he saw her. 

Everyone saw Booth. That was his curse and his nourishment. The handsome actor moved through the backstage corridors as if they were partly his property, partly his stage. He knew the walls, the turns, the stairways, the smells of gaslight and dust and greasepaint. He knew where men would step aside for him. He knew which doors stuck and which ones opened with the slightest pressure. He knew, most importantly, that fame made an assassin almost invisible. 

No one challenged his celebrated face. 

Roberta Woodward did not challenge him either. 

She admired him. "Mr. Booth?" 

He stopped. 

The interruption was so small that history nearly overlooked it. 

Booth turned, and in turning lost the first few seconds. 

"Yes?" 

"I beg your pardon," she said. "I know you are in haste." He nodded that he was. Every nerve in him knew the hour. Every calculation had been made. The laugh would come. The line producing a huge laugh would cover the shot. The corridor would be empty enough. The leap from the stage would be possible. The horse by the rear stage door would be open. 

But the woman was beautiful. In fact, grandly beautiful. She was immediate, young, bright-eyed, and close enough to the stage lamps that a gold edge touched her cheek and hair. She held out the playbill. "I wondered if you might sign this for me." 

Booth was taken aback by her blondeness then by the playbill for the current play in her hand. Then at her smile. Then, fatally, at himself reflected in her admiration. "Of course, I'll sign, but I'm not a star in this play." 

"Does it matter? I know your work?" she asked. "I saw you in The Apostate." 

Booth relaxed, smiled. "Are you an understudy?" 

"Yes. A volunteer. I'm hoping for a chance." 

That cost him more time. "We all paid our dues," he said. "It is the only thing saving actors from acute vanity." 

She laughed softly, not too loudly, not cheaply. A woman who wanted an autograph from John Wilkes Booth knew enough to make him feel witty. "Then I shall remember that from now on," she said. "But I confess I'll remember you the most." 

He took the playbill and started to sign it. 

"Do you know," she said, "I had hoped to meet you properly one day." 

"Properly?" Booth asked. "There is no such thing backstage." 

"I have never asked for an autograph before." 

He glanced up. There it was. The smallest flame. The familiar invitation. The little human tribute every actor lives for and pretends not to expect. Booth let the silence linger. "Miss," he said, "you have the advantage of me." 

"I doubt that." 

"You know my name. I do not yet know yours." 

"Roberta Woodward." 

"Miss Woodward?" It was a question not a repetition.  He said her name one more time, as if testing how it might sound from a stage. 

"Roberta if you prefer." 

"I rarely prefer propriety," Booth said. "But I admire it in women who can make it appear temporary." 

She smiled again, but missing the boldness of what was said.

Because she smiled, he began signing the playbill. "Are you here alone?" 

"I'm in the company of Dr. Charles and Sarah Taft. Sarah is my aunt. They're in the audience." 

A lesser man might have scrawled his name and gone. Booth, however, was not a lesser man in the theater. He was worse. He was a performer who believed every pause existed for his use. He searched for a better surface, found a small table crowded with pins, rouge, a cracked hand mirror, and a cup gone cold, and wrote with a flourish: To Miss Roberta Woodward, whose kindness may yet improve the American stage. 

"You are generous," she said. 

"I am accurate." She stood near him now. Near enough to smell tobacco, cologne, leather, but not the faint metal edge of anxiety he had buried beneath charm. 

"Then I shall keep it, proudly" she said. 

"You must not show it to unworthy men." 

"Are there any other kind?" 

He laughed despite himself. That cost him the last of his margin. The stage echoed with laughter. The crowd of 1,700 howled at a witty retort coming from the stage.   He heard it. 

"That was from a line by Mr. Harry Hawk," she grinned. "Do you know him?"

"Forgive me," he's a hack." His hand stopped in the air, still holding the pen. He knew the rhythm of that play the way a cavalryman knows the rhythm of hoofbeats. He knew the line he wanted. He knew the roar that was meant to cover him has been wasted. He had arranged the crime around the sound of laughter and applause, and now applause had become something that brought him back to his night's task. He handed back the playbill. "Keep that," he said. 

"I shall." 

"I've noticed you're arriving late, Mr. Booth. It's already Act III." 

"Ah," he said, reaching for one last scrap of the performance, "no one arrives late in the theater. He merely chooses a better entrance." 

"Then you chose well, Mr. Booth." 

"I most certainly did. I met you." He bowed. Not deeply. Just enough. An actor's bow, practiced into reflex. "Alas, good night, sweet princess." 

Roberta Woodward played along by dropping a little curtsey, half-mocking, half-sincere. For one absurd second they were not deadly plotter and understudy, not history and interruption, but man and woman in the warm disorder behind a stage enjoying the unexpected banter. 

 Then he left her. His smile vanished before he reached the first turn. The corridor ahead narrowed. The boards beneath his boots gave their small, familiar complaints. He passed a coil of rope, a ladder, a painted flat, a heap of costumes left in shadow. His right hand brushed the pocket where the pistol lay. His left moved once against the knife at his side. Breath entered him and would not settle. He had rehearsed this walk. Now each step had weight. He moved from the feverish life of backstage toward the colder passages that led upward. 

The sounds changed as he went. Behind him were whispers, hems of dresses, prop men, gaslight, the warm vanity of actors waiting for cues. Ahead of him were stairs, walls, closed doors, and the muffled body of an audience laughing without knowing what depended on its laughter. 

The first stair creaked beneath him. 

He stopped. No one called out. No one followed. From above came the dim vibration of voices through wood and plaster. The play continued. The nation continued. The President continued breathing. 

He climbed. 

One step. Then another. At the third step he heard a woman laugh from inside the theater, a clean laugh, free of politics, and it came to him with the force of insult. 

All evening he had imagined the audience as scenery for his act. Now it seemed separate from him, alive without his permission. 

The fourth step turned sharply. He placed his hand against the wall. The plaster was cool. For an instant he saw Roberta Woodward's face again, the playbill in her hand, his own name drying across it. The image angered him because she had no place in the planned design of how the evening would transpire. 

Beauty had no place in a plot once the plot had begun. Admiration had no place in murder. Yet he had accepted both. 

The fifth step. The stairwell seemed longer than he remembered. 

The sixth. The pistol grew more obvious.

The seventh. He could hear the play more clearly now. Lines came through the doorways in broken pieces, then a pause, then the audience responding. He tried to place the dialogue within the scene. He tried to repair the clock in his mind. He had missed one big laugh. Perhaps not the laugh. Perhaps there was still time. Theater forgave timing if the actor had nerve enough. 

The eighth step. His boot brushed grit left by other patrons. He nearly slipped, caught himself, and froze again. A man moving toward glory should not stumble on dust. 

The ninth. At the landing, he saw the corridor. It stretched ahead in a low wash of light, quieter than it should have been. Curtains moved faintly in air disturbed by doors opening and closing elsewhere in the building. The passage to the President's box lay beyond, familiar, available, waiting as it had waited in his imagination. 

But it was not empty. 


Booth took one more step, then another, slow enough now that he could hear the blood in his ears. 

At the far end, before the closed curtain that led to the Lincolns, two men stood side by side. They were not theater men. They were not actors, ushers, idlers, or hangers-on. Their coats were dark. Their shoulders were squared. Their faces were plain and alert in the poor light. Each held himself with that particular stillness that belongs to men who do not need to announce weapons because weapons have already announced them. 

Pinkerton agents. 

Armed. One stood with his hands folded loosely in front of him. The other kept his right arm close to his body, as if trained never to let a stranger know the exact distance between hand and holster. 

The curtain behind them was closed. Beyond it, only a few feet away, Abraham and Mary Lincoln sat with their guests, removed from death by cloth, wood, two wary men, and the minutes Booth had wasted on a young woman's smile. He stopped so abruptly that his heel struck the board behind him. The taller agent looked at him first. Then the second. Neither spoke at once. That was worse. Neither made the easy mistake of recognizing the famous actor and softening into admiration. They simply looked hard. They took him in from hat to boots, face to hands, coat to posture. Their eyes did what trained eyes do. They asked questions without sound. 

For one moment, Booth's entire body refused the fact before him. He had been late. The world had changed in the minutes he had given to Roberta Woodward's eyes and his own name on paper. Someone had thought better of the President's safety. Someone had sent men. Someone had closed the gap through which murder meant to pass. 

John Wilkes Booth had been discovered.  Instinctly, he spun on his heels to head back toward the steps.  The pistol in his pocket became suddenly not destiny but evidence. 

The taller agent said to Booth's back, "Can we help you, sir?" 

Booth's mouth opened. He could have acted. He had spent his life acting. He had played noblemen, villains, patriots, lovers, sons, doomed men. He had made audiences believe anguish he did not feel and courage he did not possess. But there, in that corridor, with two armed men looking at him and the President alive on the other side of the closed curtain, the actor found no line. "Sorry," Booth said over his shoulder: "I'm in the wrong..." 

He never finished the thought. He moved away before the agents could ask the question that would have ended him. His boots carried him back down the stairs, past the landing, past the walls that seemed now to lean inward with contempt, past the stair that had creaked beneath him and the corridor where his entrance had died. 

He passed the coil of rope and the painted flats. He passed the table where the ink still glistened faintly on Roberta Woodward's playbill. He did not see her again. Perhaps she had gone to her dressing room. Perhaps she was watching from some shadow, pleased with her treasure and ignorant that she had just delayed a bullet. 

Perhaps she had already tucked the playbill away, hearing applause through the walls and thinking only that John Wilkes Booth had smiled at her as if she mattered. 

Booth left Ford's Theatre by the unplanned front doors.  He dare not turn the corner and step into the alley for his waiting horse.  He hurried away into the Washington he knew well.  The city shouted, laughed, sang, and wept under the gas lamps. The city did not know it had been spared. Horses stamped at their traces. Men in uniform staggered arm in arm with civilians who had spent four years hating war and that evening loving victory. Somewhere a band debauched a patriotic air with great enthusiasm. 

Booth avoiding the street, breathing hard, moved into a tavern.

Behind him, Abraham Lincoln laughed at a line in a play. The sound never reached Booth.

Roberta Woodward heard it. Another big laugh made her laugh as well. It turned out to be a good evening.  She met a famous actor and she held her own in a bold conversation with a real man.

Inside the theater, the play went on to its harmless end. The President rose afterward to an ovation he did not seek but could not refuse. Mary took his arm. Box guests Major Rathbone and Clara Harris followed. Two Pinkerton men walked near enough to be noticed by those who noticed such things. 

Behind the backstage curtain, Roberta Woodward rolled the signed playbill and tucked it into the little pocket inside her cloak. Years later, when she discovered this night's playbill in a garment trunk in the attic of her son's home, she didn't give it a second thought and dismissed it along with other moldy trash. She barely remembered being 18 years old backstage at Ford's Theatre, on the night President Lincoln attended Our American Cousin

No authorities would question her whether John Wilkes Booth had seemed in a hurry that night. No one asked whether he had accomplices.  And so the great calamity did not occur. The President went home tired but living. 

The nation woke wounded but not orphaned. Reconstruction remained hard, bitter, compromised, and human, but it began with Lincoln still breathing. 

History seldom knows whom to thank.

As for Booth, he drank at the rooming house he had retreated to.  He counted his comrades returning, one by one. confused as to what went wrong? What happened, they asked in different ways.

"I missed my cue," he slurred. The assassin had arrived too late. And the smallest possible hinge upon which a country could have turned occurred unbeknownst to the world. 

Fate changed, however. 

Sharply, at 11 p.m. four months later in mid-August. Father Abraham was struck down when an assassin fired from behind a tree as the President rode alone on horseback along Rock Creek Road, returning from a late dinner at Willard’s Hotel. He never reached the Soldiers’ Home, his summer retreat north of the City. 

 The murderer has never been apprehended much less identified. 

That night in New York City, John Wilkes Booth was on stage at Mary Provost's Theatre starring in Shakespeare's Richard III. 

Fate regrouped. 

Denied one entrance in April, found another in August. 

***

OTHER FICTION BY THOMAS SHESS



Saturday, June 6, 2026

COFFEE BEANS & BEINGS / WHY THE WORLD LOVES LES DEUX MAGOTS

By Thomas Shess. There are cafés that sell coffee, and there are cafés that sell permission. Les Deux Magots, on Place Saint-Germain-des-Prés in Paris, has always belonged to the second category. The coffee is not the whole point. Neither is the famous terrace, the polished service, the old mirrors, the brass, the tabletops, or the long parade of people hoping to look as if they have arrived in a film that has not yet been made. The attraction is older and stranger than that. 

We go to Les Deux Magots because it allows us to sit inside an idea. For the price of a coffee, a glass of wine, or a breakfast we may not remember in detail, we are handed a chair in the republic of thought. For an hour, we may imagine that conversation still matters, that literature still has a table, that art can still be argued into existence between the waiter’s return and the arrival of the bill. That is no small seduction. 

The café began life long before its fame arrived. Its name comes from the two Chinese figures, the “magots,” that still watch over the room. Before the writers came, before the tourists came, before the cameras and guidebooks and pilgrimages, there was a shop, then a café, then a gathering place. Paris does this better than any city in the world. It allows commerce to become atmosphere, and atmosphere to become memory. 


By the late nineteenth century and early twentieth, Les Deux Magots had become one of those Left Bank addresses where the table could be as important as the desk. Poets came. Painters came. Novelists came. Philosophers came. Some were broke. Some were brilliant. Some were unbearable. A few were all three. 

The guest list has become part of the wallpaper: Verlaine, Rimbaud, Mallarmé, Apollinaire, André Gide, Jacques Prévert, Ernest Hemingway, Pablo Picasso, Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, Albert Camus and others from the grand weather system of modern culture. Mentioning the names can feel like dropping coins into a fountain. One hopes for luck by association. 

Paris, 1982

But fame alone does not explain the café’s hold on us. Many famous rooms grow cold. Many historic places become embalmed by their own reputation. Les Deux Magots remains attractive because it still performs a human service. It offers a stage without asking anyone to audition. Sit there long enough and you begin to understand the genius of the Paris café. It is public, but not impersonal. It is theatrical, but not quite false. It allows solitude and display to share the same chair. A person can read alone and still be seen. A couple can quarrel in whispers and still feel civilized. A visitor can pretend not to stare while staring at everyone. That is part of the magic. 

We are not only drinking coffee. 

We are studying the passing species. 

Janet Flanner and Ernest Hemingway at the cafe shortly after the Nazi's had been driven from Paris, 1945 

The writer at the next table may be answering email, not dashing off notes for a novel. The elegant woman in sunglasses may be waiting for an Uber, not a lover. The man with the scarf may be a professor, a banker, or a retired dentist from Cleveland. An American with his two sons: they look at Paris strolling by.  He looks at his boys. They're here in Paris.  A mental photograph that will last for a long time.It hardly matters. Les Deux Magots improves everyone slightly. It frames them. It gives each customer a little more silhouette than life usually permits. 

And then there is the deeper appeal: continuity. In a world that discards almost everything, Les Deux Magots tells us that some places survive by refusing to hurry. 

The waiters move with practiced indifference. The terrace faces the street as it always has, taking in the weather, the traffic, the changing shoes of civilization. 

The café does not need to shout its importance. The room knows what it has seen. This is why literary cafés matter even to people who do not write. They remind us that thought once had a geography. Surrealism, existentialism, postwar argument, expatriate longing, private heartbreak, public arrogance, bad drafts, good sentences, love affairs, manifestos and unpaid bills all needed somewhere to land. 

German soldiers enjoying Paris sidewalk cafes, 1941

Today, of course, the world has changed. The modern writer can work anywhere with Wi-Fi. Philosophy can be posted from an airport gate. Outrage needs no address. A laptop has replaced the cigarette, and the glowing screen has replaced the stare into the middle distance. 

Still, we come. 

We come because a famous café offers the ancient comfort of belonging to something we missed. Most of us were not there when Sartre argued, when Beauvoir observed, when Hemingway performed Hemingway, when Picasso walked through Paris as if the century had been expecting him. 

American director John Huston, right, outside the cafe with Jose Ferrer and extras from the 1952 film "Moulin Rouge." 

But at Les Deux Magots, absence becomes rentable. We cannot enter the past, but we can sit near where it happened. 

This is not foolish. 

It is human. 

A café is one of civilization’s most amazing inventions. It gives us a reason to pause without apology. It lets us be alone among others. It lets us watch life without having to explain ourselves. Churches have pews. Courts have benches. Cafés have chairs facing the street. 

Les Deux Magots adds one more gift. It lets us believe, however briefly, that our own thoughts are part of a longer conversation. We may not write a novel there. We may not solve loneliness, art, politics, love or death over coffee. But we may feel, for one Paris hour, that such things are still worth discussing. That is what attracts us. Not simply the coffee. Not simply the legends. Not simply the famous dead. 

We love Les Deux Magots because it keeps alive the romantic suspicion that a table, a cup, a street corner and a willing mind might still be enough to change the afternoon. 

And sometimes, in Paris, the afternoon is all the immortality we need. 

***


*Footnote: A “magot” is a seated Chinese or Far Eastern figurine, often made of porcelain, used as a decorative object in Europe. Les Deux Magots takes its name from the two such figures that still overlook the café’s main room. 

Friday, June 5, 2026

FRIDAY FUNNIES / COVER UP OR CRIME?


 

"A familiar ring, eh?"
with apologies to Thomas Nast via F.Stop Fitzgerald, PillartoPost.org editorial cartoonist.

Thursday, June 4, 2026

THE FOODIST / COMPLETE GUIDE TO NEW SAN DIEGO RESTAURANTS 2026

IN TIME FOR SUMMER!

GUEST BLOG / By Holden DeMayo, PillartoPost.org Restaurant Writer--Last week, Axios San Diego gave its readers the appetizer. Let's have PillartoPost.org online magazine serve the entrée. Axios list named the newcomers. Here's the kind of information a reader wants before deciding to make the trip. No slam just detail journalism with photo PillartoPost.org style:

Coronado 


• Nighthawk (See image above)

Location: 1315 Orange Avenue, Coronado CA at the Baby Grand Hotel.

Cuisine: Mediterranean-inspired restaurant and cocktail bar 

Hours: 11:30 am to 10 pm; brunch 10 am to 3 pm weekends

Phone: 619-853-2229

Website: https://www.thebabygrandcoronado.com/

Owners: Consortium Holdings 

Coolness Factor: 9/10. The same creative minds behind the Lafayette. 

• Fallen Empire [left]

Location: Baby Grand Hotel, Coronado (see above).

Cuisine: Champagne, oysters, caviar 

Owners: Consortium Holdings 

Coolness Factor: 10/10. Speakeasy access, luxury bubbles and seafood. Probably the most "special occasion" opening on the Axios list. 

***

Little Italy  


Sugarfish 

Cuisine: Sushi by Nozawa 

Address: 2100 Kettner Blvd., Suite 1100, San Diego, CA 92101 

Phone: (858) 326-1294 Cuisine: Japanese sushi and omakase-inspired fixed menus 

Hours: Daily 11:30 a.m. to 10 p.m. 

Website: https://sugarfishsushi.com/

Owners: Sushi Nozawa restaurant group, founded by chef Kazunori Nozawa. 

Coolness Factor: 9/10. A LA cult favorite finally lands in San Diego. Expect long waits and Instagram sightings. 

*** 

Gaslamp Quarter 


• Saya Brasserie 

Location: 901 Fifth Ave. (inside the Gaslamp district) 

Cuisine: Middle Eastern-influenced café and brasserie fare 

Phone: (954-716-9217

Website: https://www.opentable.com/r/saya-brasserie-san-diego?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Owners: Dubai hospitality group 

Coolness Factor: 8.5/10. The design alone has people talking. 

Coolness factor: One of the more visually ambitious openings of the year. 

***

 Barrio Logan 

• Las Cuatro Milpas 

Location: 1985 National Avenue, Unit 1131 in the Mercado del Barrio, National Avenue, Barrio Logan next door to Northgate Market 

Cuisine: Legendary Mexican comfort food 

Phone: 619-234-4460

Hours: 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. daily 

Menu/website: places.singleplatform.com

Owners: Estudillo family 

Coolness Factor: 10/10. Not new, but reborn. Few restaurants possess this much San Diego history and neighborhood. 

***

 Del Mar 


• Queenstown Public House 

Location: 1435 Camino Del Mar suite D, Del Mar CA

Cuisine: New Zealand-inspired comfort food, brunch and burgers 

Phone: 858-925-5771

Website: https://queenstowndelmar.com/

Hours: Mon thru Thurs: 11 am to 9 pm; Fri. 11 am thru 10 pm; Sat & Sun 9 am thru 9 pm

Owners: Queenstown restaurant group: Phillip Lamont and Matt Baker 

Coolness Factor: 8/10. New Zealand themes remain rare enough to feel fresh in Southern California. 

***

La Jolla



• Cala La Jolla Café (out dated photo)

Location: 7910 Girard Avenue, Historic Arcade Building, La Jolla Village 

Cuisine: Café fare, pastries, coffee and brunch items 

Phone: 858-333-8610

Website: https://calalajolla.com

Owner: Amy de Leon

Hours: 6 am thru 6 pm

Coolness Factor: 8/10. Historic setting gives it a built-in advantage with architecture and history buffs. 

Coming Soon

• Telefèric Barcelona 

Location: Westfield UTC La Jolla.   Popular Barcelona-inspired California chain 

Cuisine: Spanish tapas and paella Origin

Coolness Factor: 9/10. This one may become the most talked-about coming soon opening still to come. 

***

 Chula Vista 

• TNT Pizza 

Location: 550 14th St., Chula Vista 

Cuisine: Pizza 

Phone: 619 915-92101

Web: https://www.toasttab.com/

Hours: Daily 11 am to 10 pm

Coolness Factor: 7.5/10. Detroit-style pizza, New York-style slices, Sicilian pizza, vegan options, salads, wings, beer and wine. The restaurant is known for its retro 1980s arcade atmosphere.

***

 Encinitas 

• Arcana 

Cuisine: Speakeasy-style cocktail lounge featuring craft cocktails, tapas, small plates, and an intimate, hidden-bar atmosphere rather than a traditional full-service restaurant.

Location: 517 S Coast Hiway 101, Encinitas 

Phone: 760-492-7444

Hours: 5 pm to 10:30 pn, Closed Sun. & Mon.

Owners: The project was developed by the owners of The Roxy Theatre, Encinitas, one of Encinitas' best-known restaurant and nightlife venues. Public reports identify Arcana as a sister concept to The Roxy.

***


ʥ Mon Cheri Caf̩ & Bistro [coming soon]

Location: 947 S Coast Hiway 101, Encinitas CA

Cuisine: French-inspired café and Mediterranean bistro menu 

Phone: 619 694-5791

Website: https://moncheriencinitas.com/

Owners: Independent family-operated cafe.  Names not available at press time.

Coolness Factor: 8/10. A little Paris or a Riviera Cafe by the Pacific. Call for opening date.

***

Oceanside 


•  PopUp Bagels 

Location: 510 Vista Way, Oceanside CA The shop occupies the former Black Market Bakery space in the Freeman Collective development, one of Oceanside's more interesting food-and-retail projects near South Oceanside.

Cuisine: New York-style bagels served hot and whole, accompanied by rotating flavored schmears (cream cheeses). Their signature approach is "Grip, Rip and Dip," encouraging customers to tear apart fresh bagels and share them.

Owners: The Oceanside franchise is operated by local partners Paul Goodman and Griffin Thall, known in San Diego food circles as "The Bagel Boyz." They also launched the successful La Jolla location before expanding into Oceanside.

Phone: 855-747-6347

Website: https://www.popupbagels.com/

Hours: Daily 7 am to 3 pm

Coolness Factor: 8.5/10. East Coast transplants are already lining up. 

***


 * Koakai Brewing Company 

Location: 559 Greenbrier Dr. Oceanside CA

Cuisine: Brewery with sushi and barbecue components 

Phone: Unavailable at press time.

Owners: Mike and Tomomi Aubuchon

Website: Instagram

Coolness Factor: 8/10. The combination sounds odd until you realize San Diegans love beer and experimentation. 

***

 Vista 


• Black Bear Diner 

Location: 605 West Vista Way, Vista CA

Cuisine: Classic American diner; breakfast served all day; comfort food 

Phone: 760-249-2327

Website: https://blackbeardiner.com/

Owners: Black Bear Diner chain, founded by Bruce Dean and Bob & Laurie Manley. Vista is a corporate-operated location.

Hours: Daily 6 am to 10 pm

Coolness Factor: 7.5/10. Big portions, mountain-lodge décor, and comfort-food nostalgia.

***

 • Carmel Valley  


Addison Champagne Lounge within the Fairmont Grand Del Mar

Address: 5200 Grand Del Mar Way, Del Mar CA

Cuisine: Champagne, luxury bites and pre-dinner experiences 

Phone: 858-314-1900

Website: https://www.addisondelmar.com/

Owner/Chef: William Bradley 

Hours: Tues. thru Sat. 5 pm to final seating approx. 8:30 pm

Coolness Factor: 10/10. Attached to San Diego's most decorated fine-dining address. The only three-Michelin-star restaurant in Southern California

***

NOTE: If you're reading this in PillartoPost.org, let's go one step further and rank them by "Most Likely to Still Matter in Five Years." 

Our early top five would be: 

 --Las Cuatro Milpas 

--Addison Champagne Lounge

--Sugarfish  

--Nighthawk

--Telefèric Barcelona 

Why? Great concept, reputation, deep pockets.

That's the long list PillartoPost.org editors put their money on hang around.



Wednesday, June 3, 2026

RETRO FILES / THE CHORUS GIRL WHO BROUGHT DOWN DOWNING STREET.


C
hristine Keeler: A Brief Life of Rise and Fall Christine Keeler (1942–2017) was one of the most famous—and tragic—figures of 1960s Britain, her life defined by sudden notoriety, political scandal, and a long, uneven aftermath. 

Born in Uxbridge and raised in poverty, Keeler endured a harsh childhood marked by instability and abuse. As a teenager she moved to London, where her looks and poise landed her work as a model and showgirl at Murray’s Cabaret Club in Soho. 

There she entered a fast, glamorous orbit of aristocrats, entertainers, and power brokers—an ascent that would prove both intoxicating and dangerous. Her life changed abruptly in 1961 when she met osteopath and society fixer Stephen Ward, who introduced her to powerful men, including British Secretary of State for War John Profumo. 

Keeler also had contact with a Soviet naval attaché at the height of the Cold War. 

When her relationships became public, the resulting scandal—the Profumo Affair—rocked the British government and forced Profumo’s resignation. 

The upswing of Keeler’s sudden fame quickly turned into a steep fall. She became a tabloid obsession and a scapegoat for wider anxieties about class, sex, and national security. In 1963 she was convicted of perjury in an unrelated case and served time in prison. 

Meanwhile, Stephen Ward was prosecuted in a controversial trial and died before sentencing. After prison, Keeler struggled to rebuild her life. She married twice, had children, and wrote several memoirs attempting to reclaim her narrative, though financial instability and public scrutiny persisted. 

In later years, she came to be viewed with more sympathy—a young woman caught in forces far larger than herself, used and discarded by the powerful circles she briefly inhabited. Christine Keeler died in 2017 at the age of 75. 

Her story remains a touchstone in British cultural history: a cautionary tale of glamour, class collision, and the brutal cost of becoming the face of a national scandal. 

THOSE PHOTOS! 

Shortly after ‘The Profumo Affair’ was exposed in the newspapers, Christine Keeler was brought to Lewis Morley’s Studio located above The Establishment satirical night club in Soho. 

A film company was intending to make a film about the scandal and required some publicity photographs. 


Keeler had initially agreed to being photographed nude but, when she arrived at the studio, felt reluctant to do so. Still photographer Lewis Morley began the photo session by taking photographs of Keeler in her clothes but the representatives of the film company insisted that she pose nude. 

The photographer, sensing Keeler’s distress, suggested a way in which the matter could be resolved. He made the others present leave, and, turning his back while Keeler undressed, suggested that she posed on the studio chair placed back to front. 

 The contact sheet (top of this blog) is from Lewis Morley’s original negatives from the photographic session. They were printed for his first retrospective exhibition held at the National Portrait Gallery in 1989. 

PillartoPost.org managed to pull out two shots from the flames of notoriety. The shot below is the one that lit the tabloid firestorm in the Mother Country in 1963


Meanwhile after she left prison she wasn't as shy about posing nude for photographers.  The test sheet shows Christine posing for a photog named Duffy, who was on assignment to provide King Magazine (Brit's 60s version of Playboy) images of the once shy 19-year-old siren.



Tuesday, June 2, 2026

A PRIMER / HOW TO BEHAVE IN THE JUNGLE

 


LESSON #1 [Be warned more to come] 

 Because manners, good sense and a clever amount of chivalry has gone to hell in a hand basket, this online magazine has entrusted Clive Boomer & Associates to prepare an occasional guide to how to behave in a world dominated by idiots (no offense to those who are true idiots). Ignoring these posts will only encourage Clive (and fellow Boomers) to post more of these correctionary tales penned by him or a favored associate. 

 WHEN TO PROPERLY SOUND YOUR HORN 

By Brae Canlen 

Five reasons to honk at another vehicle: 

1. The vehicle looks like it might rear-end or crash into you. 

 2. The vehicle is about to hit a pedestrian 

 3. The vehicle is about to hit a dog, cat, nun, rabbit, or row of marching ducks. 

 4. A meteor, plane, or other flying object is descending rapidly, threatening life and limb. 

 5. The light has turned green and the vehicle in front of you is not moving. After a three-second delay, a tap on the horn is appropriate. A full blast of the horn is simply rude. 

 Five reasons NOT to honk at another vehicle 

 1. The driver in front of you is too slow and this annoys you. 

 2. The driver in front of you is waiting for pedestrians at a crosswalk and this annoys you. 

 3. The driver in front of you slows down to make a turn and this annoys you. 

 4. The driver in front of you slows down or stops to park his or her vehicle and this annoys you. 

 5. The other drivers at a four-way stop sign make you wait your turn and this annoys you. 

 ### 

 The author is a Southern California freelance writer stuck between generational portals. 

Monday, June 1, 2026

MEDIA MONDAY / H0W DEEP THE TOADIES HAVE SUNK THE DOJ

With apologies to Herblock via PillartoPost.org online magazine

GUEST ESSAY / By The New Republic Magazine--In case you missed it, CNN originally reported late last Wednesday that the Justice Department was opening a probe into whether E. Jean Carroll, the New York woman who successfully sued Donald Trump and won $88.3 million in damages for sexual abuse and defamation, lied during the legal proceedings against Trump, and that Andrew Boutros, the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, would be leading the investigation. Then, on Thursday, Boutros said, Hey, not me!, categorically denying that he was investigating Carroll. 

This is extraordinary on so many levels. First and foremost, it’s shocking and disgusting that the Trump administration would even contemplate doing this. 

It’s important to dip briefly into the facts here. Yes, in a 2022 deposition, Carroll misrepresented the fact that Democratic billionaire Reid Hoffman donated to her defense fund. Her lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, has said that Carroll recalled later, sometime in 2023—it seems worth bearing in mind that she was in her late seventies at the time—that she had received some outside donations and that she told Kaplan, and Kaplan immediately told Trump’s lawyers. Those lawyers tried to pounce on this new information to cast doubt on Carroll’s credibility, but the judge barred Trump’s lawyers from using it at trial. Two juries subsequently found Trump liable for both sexual assault and defamation. 

That’s the background. 

Here’s the important part, as detailed by Lisa Rubin in a recent MS NOW column: Trump appealed, twice, trying to get appellate courts to agree that Carroll was lying, and he lost both times. First, a three-judge appellate panel upheld Trump’s conviction and believed that Carroll just forgot: "Ms. Carroll plausibly represented that she had forgotten about the limited outside funding," the panel wrote. Second, eight of 10 active judges on an appellate panel in June 2025 denied a request for rehearing by Trump’s lawyers. (And even just last month, a third appellate panel denied a rehearing of the defamation case.) 

If you look at that June 2025 ruling I linked to above, you’ll see an interesting name listed as counsel for "defendant-appellant": Todd Blanche. This, of course, is the same Todd Blanche who is running the Department of Justice today. 

When Trump fired Pam Bondi as attorney general and stories came out that Trump had been displeased with her lack of zeal about going after his enemies, you, like me, probably wondered how anybody could possibly be more of an unethical, corrupt, cowardly lickspittle than Bondi was. She brought—or tried to bring—prosecutions against Trump antagonists Letitia James, James Comey, James Brennan, Fani Willis, and more. 

When career prosecutors declined to bring those cases, she fired them and brought in incompetent hacks to do Trump’s bidding. In some cases, federal judges found these hacks to have been installed illegally. Bondi was venally corrupt, on an absolutely Wagnerian level. 

Just this week, in fact, a retired chief justice of the Florida Supreme Court, backed by 120 judges, attorneys, and law professors, brought a blistering ethics complaint against Bondi demanding that she be investigated and disbarred. That complaint is mostly about her handling of the Epstein files because, remember, she behaved indefensibly there too. So how could anyone be more corrupt than that? I’ll tell you exactly how, through Trump’s eyes: They could succeed where Bondi failed. 

That was her crime. Not obviously and serially violating departmental ethical canons. Her crime was not doing it well. Hence, Blanche. The fact that his name was on that appellate denial—that he was one of Trump’s lawyers in the Carroll proceedings—means he has personal skin in this game, which in turn means that there’s no way on earth this should be happening on his watch. 

And indeed, he is said to have "recused" himself on the matter of the Carroll investigation. So it was tossed to Boutros, in Chicago. But Boutros, as I noted above, says he’s not investigating Carroll. He maintains that he’s only investigating Hoffman’s nonprofit, American Future Republic. It’s based in Chicago, you see, so there’s the veneer of justification. But this just raises the question: What has American Future Republic done wrong? 

It’s allowed to donate money to a legal defense fund. It’s a 501(c)4, not a (c)3, the basic difference being that a (c)4 is allowed to be more directly political (also that donations to a (c)4 are generally not deductible as charitable contributions). GuideStar records show that the group did donate $7 million to Kaplan’s former law firm in 2020. That is by far its largest single donation. But even so, so what? 

The material question here isn’t whether Hoffman partly or even wholly paid for Carroll’s defense. The question is whether she lied about it. Three different panels of judges believe she did not. 

What’s really going on with this investigation, one sniffs, is this. Trump is running out of appeals here. As Lisa Rubin wrote in the column I cited above: "In other words, Trump is facing down the increasingly real possibility of paying Carroll more than $88 million, before interest, with only the Supreme Court to potentially rescue him." 

So he and his current lawyers are trying to resuscitate the issue that a judge prevented them from using at the original 2023 trial. That’s not necessarily a crazy, last-ditch legal strategy for a person faced with writing that kind of check. The problem, though, is that the person is the sitting president of the United States, and "his current lawyers" are the U.S. Department of Justice, which he has corrupted. 

And by the way, if you want to know more about this Boutros fellow, just read Michelle Goldberg’s column today about his ghastly attempt to prosecute six people, including onetime Democratic congressional candidate Kat Abughazaleh, on felony conspiracy charges. 

The case fell apart last week after prosecutors admitted to misconduct before the grand jury. As Goldberg put it, "If Trump didn’t manufacture scandals on such an industrial scale, the case that collapsed last week in Chicago would have been a huge story." So many things would have been huge stories under any other presidency. 

For example, Trump’s purchase of Dell stock and the awarding of a large Pentagon contract to the company. AND White House intervention to get a $620 million contract funneled to a company affiliated with Don Jr. AND the ongoing ICE scandals, with Democratic pols being prevented from being able to inspect horrid conditions at ICE’s detention camps. AND the new homeland security secretary vowing to cancel international flights to certain liberal cities. AND the plainly illegal effort to put Trump’s face on a new $250 bill. 

Any one of those, in normal times, would be a major scandal. And those were just this week! 

The New Republic pondered writing about each of those. we chose the Carroll matter because it’s not only obviously corrupt but another cannon blast at the rule of law and the independence and integrity of the Justice Department. And because it’s something new: Are investigations into liberal nonprofits to become a regular thing now? 

So far, Trump has used the DOJ completely unethically, but he’s used it just to go after a handful of personal enemies. If he and Blanche open up the gates to start harassing liberal groups on a much wider basis, then we’re truly in tinpot dictator territory (see PillartoPost.org online magazine's Thomas Nast parody of tinpot despots). AND, yes it can, and will, get worse.