The following published
column was written when the late Rowland Stiteler [1947-2019] was editor of D
Magazine, a post he held from the late 1970s to the early 80s. His popular
column was called Editor’s Page and this particular selection is
refreshing. His insight rings familiar
bells with writers and editors everywhere:
“Hazards of Being an Editor”
By Rowland Stiteler
They are
good values, those fundamental tenants taught us by the Judeo/Christian
culture. Those beliefs have enabled us
to build America, cure polio, land on the moon and return safely and feed the
poor.
But, as a former writer for
this magazine used to say, no deal is perfect.
There is one glaring erroneous but widely held value that runs
throughout our culture. We revere writers
to the point of imitation. We think, God
help us, that a good education is not complete unless we are writers.
Editor Stiteler |
They are a diverse lot, but
generally share one common trait: They can’t write.
The writer’s curse extends
beyond those to whom writing is a hobby and real estate or architecture is a
profession. It causes thousands of our
young people to waste big chucks of their lives in the halls of academe,
studying Journalism or English, reading Thomas Wolfe and Tom Wolfe, and
dreaming of the day their essays will grace the pages of Esquire & The New Yorker.
The odds of entering a
college or university and emerging four years later as a writer are about the
same as entering Las Vegas casino with two bucks and a yen for three-card monte
and emerging a millionaire. (In some
cases your casino odds are going to be a little better than your college odds;
it all depends on what casino you choose and how long it has been since the
house has been beaten.
But the fact is those of us
who aspire to be writers are not a reasoning lot; we are driven by romanticism
and ego. (I speak from personal
experience.) We are, as a group, willing
to work long hours for short wages and the thrill of seeing our names in print.
We labor under the naïve concept that by reporting to you that
Councilman Smedlap overspent his budget by $31.62, or that the quiche is
overcooked at Chez Fred’s, we are somehow changing the course of history. We think each story marks a small stride for
mankind and moves us a step close to our first national best seller.
For years a controversy has
raged din the editorial offices of my magazine with regard to journalism
graduates. One of the top executives has
always held that journalism graduates make horrible journalists—and worse
writers—and therefore should be categorically barred from consideration as job
applicates here. For years, I was the
only journalism graduate on the staff, an exception that my boss said merely
proved his point. Because I invested four years in journalism school, it is, of
course, incumbent on me to take a differing view.
My experience with graduates
of college journalism programs as magazine writers has yielded the following
unmistakable truth: Journalism schools are benign, not malignant.
There is nothing about going
to journalism school that will keep an eager, smart and well-motivated young
person from becoming a good writer someday.
Therefore, in dealing with potential employees, I never hold it against
someone if (s)he has been to journalism school.
A J-schooler is generally no
more qualified to write than someone who attended the Midas Muffler Academy,
but is certainly not less qualified.
The fact is that there is no
set of credentials that identifies a person as a writer, a creative person who
can put words on paper/screen in a manner that other people will pay to
read. Writers are rich and poor,
sophisticates and slobs.
One of the most talented
members of the Ft. Worth journalism community for many years, for instance, was
a charming individual who had this problem with green teeth. If only he had brushed them once in a while,
he would have had a blinding smile. But
wow, that guy produced great copy.
By contrast, one of the best
writers D Magazine has ever had, contributing writer Jo Brans, is an impeccably
groomed woman who looks like a schoolteacher, probably because she is one of
those rare writers who is good enough that, as an editor, I basically don’t
care what topic he chooses. Good writing
is good writing. “What do you want my
story to be about,” she asks. “About 20
pages,” I reply.
The dilemma facing all
editors is that there is no simple way to tell a Jo Brans from the bus loads of
also-rans by looking at them. But these
so-sos would do all of us a favor if they’d simply give up and take up stamp
collecting or some other form of self-entertainment.
True writers are born and
made. They have an innate creativity
[there is no substitute for it and there is no way to teach it] and they have
usually sharpened that talent through the learning process, be it in college or
at the magazine rack of the corner drug store.
But there is just no way to
spot them by perusing their resumes or glancing through clippings they have
written for other publications.
(Sometimes, excellent clippings can be the work not of the writer but of
a skillful editor.) And that brings us
to my problem—as an editor—and the problem of every other editor who cares
about the quality of his/her publication.
There is no substitute for
answering every phone call, discussing every story proposal, reading every
manuscript (at least in part) that comes in unsolicited. And that is why I do, and will, respond to
everyone who has the requisite imagination—or audacity—to propose a writing
project for this magazine.
It is my opinion that there
are probably 50 people within a 50-mile radius of downtown Dallas who have the
skills, talent and wherewithal to write a good magazine article. I only know about 20 of those people, counting
D Magazine staff and contributing editors.
One of the parts of this job that I consider a duty is to constantly be
looking for the other 30.
For those of you interested
in becoming one of the 30, I suggest a few commonsense rules. Read our magazine before submitting
ideas. (When you ask me on the telephone
for our address or to spell may name, that tells me you’ve never seen our
masthead.) Don’t send photocopied query
letters with “Dear Blank” at the top.
Never propose to write anything about J.R. Ewing, Dealey Plaza, the Metroplex
or the Dallas Cowboy’s latest hotshot.
Never mail us anything you can’t afford to us to lose; we probably
will. Most of all, however, don’t think
that the editors of this magazine think over the transom proposals are
categorically worthless.
I know someone who got a job
with a good magazine that way. Me.
PET PEEVES FROM OTHER EDITORS.
--Don’t automatically assume
each editor has similar tastes or needs.
Some editors return phone calls others don’t.
--Don’t beg. It is not the fault of the editor if you
can’t pay the rent if you don’t get an assignment.
--If you wish to get the
attention of an editor via Email you still must write in coherent, complete
sentences that get to the point.
--Don’t submit same article
idea to more than one editor at a time.
--Don’t suggest articles by
your PR friends because they probably were on the phone to us the same day with
the same idea.
--If it isn’t true don’t put
it in your article.
--Understand travel or
home/garden magazines can not save the Allende Revolution in Chile.
--If you haven’t heard back
from an editor in six months consider his/her answer was “no” to your proposal.
--The busiest [heartless?] editors
often automatically return article proposals without reading them because
statistically about one percent of unsolicited proposals are worth
printing. Not all editors are so
inclined. In one editor’s case his
staff waited until the “no” stack got two feet high before sending over an
intern to mail out the rejection notices.
BEST BUSINESS CARD LINE FROM FREELANCE WRITER.
“If it didn’t happen that
way—it should have...” By the late great
Tom Basinski, author of “No Good Deed.”
No comments:
Post a Comment