GUEST BLOG—By Paul
Gatsa, Director, Brewers Association--I woke up September 16 to news that
Anheuser Busch-InBev (ABI) is working to acquire SABMiller. Discussion of this
potential merger has been around for years. The first time I thought seriously
about it was when Carlos Laboy spoke at a Beer Business Daily Summit in around
2009 about how it makes sense financially and fits the DNA of the bankers that
put together Anheuser Busch-InBev.
There seems to be more credence given to the idea that it
may actually get done this time. My understanding of the status is that
Anheuser Busch-InBev confirms that it is approaching SABMiller about an
acquisition of the company.
This post is not about whether it will happen, but about
what can be expected here if it did. I find I have more questions than answers.
I am focused on the U.S. picture and what it might mean for this market. I
anticipate many interested parties will engage to help The Department of
Justice (DOJ) evaluate concentration of market concerns. Regulators would be
expected to require that the Miller component in the U.S. not be included in
the deal for concentration of market concerns.
DOJ didn’t allow the U.S. absorption of Modelo without a
selloff (to Constellation Brands-Beer Divsion), so it is hard to think that
they would allow absorption of Miller.
That means that Miller brands in the U.S. could be sold off to
MolsonCoors or other large international entities inside or outside of the
current beer universe. Constellation Brands—Beer Division, Heineken or
Carlsberg could all have some interest. There may be large money interests
looking to get into the beer space as well, as beer at that scale generates
significant cash flow and profitability.
My notes from Benj Steinman’s intro at the 2014 Beer
Marketers Insights Spring Conference show that MillerCoors had an operating
profit in the U.S. of just under $1.3 billion in 2013. That number will be very
attractive to somebody. Who is willing to pay what to get it? I have also read
today that Chinese regulators may have an interest.
There is always this tickler in the back of my mind when I
think about MillerCoors that the companies involved entered into a 10-year
joint venture in 2008. What are the details of that joint venture in the event
of this potential deal? Does renewal of the joint venture become less
attractive to MolsonCoors based on a new partner if they don’t get the Miller
brands in the U.S.?
Does a potential joint venture with a new partner
potentially bring different international brands into the picture creating an
even larger? What happens with non-Miller-branded products owned by SABMiller
that are imported into the U.S.? What
happens with a brand such as Leinenkugel’s, which was bought by Miller in 1988?
Would the Leinenkugel’s brands be a required divestment or could that
potentially become owned by Anheuser Busch-InBev?
In terms of impact on craft, my first thought is that most
craft brewers operate in a different sphere—their communities and regions
primarily. They serve the roles/purposes of being parts of and building
communities.
Many craft brewers would look at a potential deal of
Anheuser Busch-InBev and SABMiller as not relevant to their businesses and will
keep on doing what they do—make flavorful and high quality beer, engage beer
drinkers and serve the community through jobs, involvement and serving as a
place for people to gather and discuss the events of the day.
The American public continues to respond by sampling more
new craft brewed beers and buying more of their favorites. Those societal
trends won’t change because of this deal. (Although there could be a danger of
greater commoditization perception of beers in the same lager and light lager
profiles if people think of the large brewers as being all the same company.)
If the merger fails |
It is hard to see the retail landscape changing much because
of the deal. Will it matter to the beer drinker? Can the beer drinker relate to
news of a global megamerger about beer? There have been an increasing number of
craft brewer transactions inside and outside of craft lately.
To what degree will this giant merger and other deals, some
of which may impact beer drinkers’ relationships to specific brewers, impact
perceptions of beer to where it becomes less of an item of personal passion or
more of an item of personal passion? Will future transactions in and from the
craft space hurt the brand of craft? Time will tell all.
Bottom line: “It
is hard to see the retail landscape changing much because of the deal...” –Paul
Gatza.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Paul Gatza is the
director of the Brewers Association (BA), a not-for-profit trade association
whose purpose is to promote and protect American craft brewers and American
craft beer and the community of brewing enthusiasts. Paul is a member of the
association’s Brewpubs, Technical, Communications, Market Development, PR &
Marketing and Government Affairs Committees.
Paul’s origin in the
beer community started when he took up homebrewing in 1990. He worked on the
bottling line at Boulder Beer and would sneak over to the brewhouse when
opportunity allowed. He owned a pair of homebrew supply shops in Boulder and
Longmont, Colorado from 1994 to 1998. He served as director of the American
Homebrewers Association for 7 years and is in his 15th year as BA director.
Paul is ranked as a National Beer Judge by the Beer Judge Certification
Program. Paul is also a former judge director of both the Great American Beer
Festival and World Beer Cup, before moving to the judge panels for these elite
competitions.
No comments:
Post a Comment